"Natural monopoly" is the one condition among the following choices where the <span>market make unified control necessary or desirable to the public interest. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option or option "B". I hope the answer has come to your help.</span>
<span>In 1763, the French and Indian War ended in favor of the British, bringing about a change in the political, economic, and ideological relationship between Britain and the US colonies. When the French and Indian War ended, the countries that owned land in North America changed, and it led to Britain becoming one of the most powerful country. During this time, the relationship between American colonists and their British government was wary, and eventually led to the Proclamation of 1763. The Proclamation was Britain wanting to keep conflict from happening, however, it had the opposite effect on their colonists, as they felt that Britain abandoned their rights while imposing unnecessary rules onto them. On top of that, Britain increased the taxes and laws for their American colonists that strictly regulated trade, imposed taxes on commonly used items, and made sure that the Americans did not have relationships with any other European countries. This led to the Americans becoming infuriated because of these unjust taxations.
This sudden change in the amount of laws and taxes placed on the colonists strained the economic relationship the colonists had with their country. For example, the Wool, Hat, and Iron Acts forced Americans to ship their raw material to Britain, and to buy only finished products from them. On top of this, the Stamp Act enraged many of the colonists, and, as Benjamin Franklin stated, wanted the Act(s) to be repealed as quickly as possible. They practiced smuggling and non-importation/consumption of British goods, which strained their relationships even more.
Even though the colonial ideological values towards Britain began to change during the war, the colonists ability to fight back using boycotts proved that when they united together, they can change circumstances. Also, during and after the French and Indian War, the Americans soldiers felt that they had less liberty than the Englishmen. As stated by a Massachusetts soldier when he wrote that “we are debarred Englishmen’s liberty.” Their resentment continued to grow, until it became unbearable and it triggered the Revolutionary War. The French and Indian War was the trigger to the start of the American Revolution, as it changed the political, economic, and social status between England and her colonists, because the English imposed unfair taxes to help pay for their own economic struggles. The colonists, to fight back, boycotted, smuggled, and protested, further damaging their relationships with Britain. Finally, the last straw was when British troops shot into American crowds during the Boston massacre. From that point of history on, all status of countries had changed.<span>(note:horrible ending.. might want to change it)
hope this helps</span></span>
Adding on to the first answer ^^^
Primary sources can also be unreliable as they are biased depending on the source.
If comparing histories of different countries, they tend to describe more victories rather than failures. Also, having a picture as a primary source can be misleading as it can be interpreted in different ways. Sources written in the first person can also have their own biased from the environment the author has lived in.
Answer:
In September 1937, Mussolini visited Germany. ... As Germany had left the League of Nations in 1933,
so Mussolini left the League in 1937 after the League had imposed economic sanctions on Italy for the invasion of Abyssinia.25-May-2015
