When Franklin Delano Roosevelt took office in 1933, he enacted a range of experimental programs to combat the Great Depression.
The New Deal was a set of domestic policies enacted under President Franklin D. Roosevelt that dramatically expanded the federal government’s role in the economy in response to the Great Depression.
Historians commonly speak of a First New Deal (1933-1934), with the “alphabet soup” of relief, recovery, and reform agencies it created, and a Second New Deal (1935-1938) that offered further legislative reforms and created the groundwork for today’s modern social welfare system.
It was the massive military expenditures of World War II, not the New Deal, that eventually pulled the United States out of the Great Depression
The term New Deal derives from Franklin Roosevelt’s 1932 speech accepting the Democratic Party’s nomination for president. At the convention Roosevelt declared, “I pledge you, I pledge myself, to a new deal for the American people.” Though Roosevelt did not have concrete policy proposals in mind at the time, the phrase "New Deal" came to encompass his many programs designed to lift the United States out of the Great Depression
I think this will help you
Answer: they resolved disputes, upheld civil law, were military leaders, and spiritual leaders.
Explanation:
The historical inquiry skills that might be important for a citizenry to have to address current global challenges include:
- Critical thinking.
- Research assessing information.
<h3>What are skills?</h3>
It should be noted that skills are the traits and qualities that are important to address issues and challenges.
In this case, the historical inquiry skills that might be important for a citizenry to have to address current global challenges include critical thinking and research assessing information.
Learn more about skills on:
brainly.com/question/1233807
Answer:
This might help I found it interesting and I hope you find the answer your looking for
Explanation:
https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1440&context=nrj
Whether reporters should point out in stories when sources are saying things that are demonstrably false