What was one major difference between french and british colonists in the americas during the 1700s?

2 answers:

7 0

British - Colonists were recruited from among middle-class farmers, artisans, tradesmen, indentured servants, convicted criminals or immigrants from other countries.
French - Initially fur traders, merchants, and missionaries. In 1665 some 1100 French soldiers arrived and were given land. Neither Protestants nor peasant farmers were allowed to emigrate.

Tasya [4]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

French colonists generally had friendlier relations with American Indians.

Explanation:

apex

You might be interested in

A unified group of countries that communist bloc was located in what world region

Tju [1.3M]

A unified group of countries, the Communist bloc was located in central and Eastern Europe, East Asia and Southeast Asia under the hegemony of the URSS. This bloc was denominated as Eastern bloc. And encompassed countries such as Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary and several other European countries. This was a group that was led by the mighty Stalin of USSR.

3 0

3 years ago

Both the samurai and knights generally fought on horseback. Who would have been in the most trouble if he was knocked from his h

leonid [27]

Both the samurai and knights generally fought on horseback.

The Samurai armors were made of metal and was put together with leather and silk.
The armor was made in a way so that samurai can move freely using their swords.
The knights armor were made of steel plate and were very popular during the 15th century.
According to researchers, the knights armors weighed 30 to 50 kilograms.
To run or fight the knights have to use twice the amount of energy from normal soldier with no armor.
For a knight it will be most trouble if he was knocked from his horse or his horse was killed.