Answer:
Yes, Rawls could collect.
Explanation:
It is possible that Rawls collects damages due to negligence. This is due to the fact that the main cause of the accident was not substantiated by the Progressive Northern Insurance Company. The company claimed that the accident could have been caused by a series of events and the company was also not certain about the main cause of the accident.
Answer:
$105,547
Explanation:
Original cost of machine = $270,000
Machine sold for = $150,000
Book value = $120,000
Down payment = $30,000
$60,000 payable on December 31 each of the next two years
.
Present value of an ordinary annuity of 1 at 9% for 2 years = 1.75911
The amount of the notes receivable net of the unamortized discount:
= Amount paid on December 31st × Present value of an ordinary annuity
= $60,000 × 1.75911
= $105,547
<h2>Evaluating one's contribution gets employee thinking about their performance.</h2>
Explanation:
Self-appraisal is one of the best method to assess themselves of what kind of contribution that he has made to the company to grow.
He can also look back about the opportunities that the company has given to him to perform.
This actually,
- speaks for results
- gets the chance to do peer review
- an exercise to grow in terms of career
- list out the achievements of self
- contribution done by the self
So the chosen statement supports Dylan's idea.
Answer:
this case tells us about some sort of pressures that accounts feel when financial statements are needed urgently
Explanation:
1) As for using low estimates, this step was wrong on her part. she should have been upfront in her estimates. for the items that she could not estimate there should have been an indication that such items were still under review, instead of doing what she did to give the financial estimate a good look. Using guesses or deliberately using low estimates was a bad idea, GAAP would never condone that.
She should have met with the president and let him know that finalization of the financial statements would not possible within the time frame that he has given. She could have also explain that such delays are normal and she would have given estimates of when the draft internal copy would be made available to him. such steps she took could have resulted in serious consequences for the company
2) I would not inflate or deflate the figures on purpose to make financial statements look better. If it is time to present the draft and final year-end financial statements I will have to tell the truth on the numbers and estimations used and also the reasons for that. i would have explained the constraints that i was facing. if i was still being pressurized by the president, i would have no choice than to call it quits instead of going against the ethics of my profession, since there are both ethical and legal implications to not giving inaccurate financial statements.