They gain freedom of speech and other individual freedoms but lose a strong, centralized leader to confidently rule the public
WHO IM I SOMEONE THATS AFRAID TO LET IT GO YOU DECIDE IF YOU EVER GONNA LET ME KNOW
A debate from the perspective of a Northerner over Missouri Statehood would be one talking about the importance of limiting slavery.
A argument from a Southerner would be one arguing that Northerners should allow slavery in states that want slavery.
<h3>What were the arguments for Missouri Statehood?</h3>
Missouri wanted to gain admission into the Union as a slave state and the North did not want this because they were against slavery spreading to other parts of the Union.
Southerners on the other hand, wanted slavery in Missouri as they believed that it would increase the power of slave states in Congress. They therefore argued that territories such as Missouri that wanted slavery, should be free to have slavery.
Find out more on Missouri Statehood at brainly.com/question/1855671.
As Senator Dodd of Illinois was elected in 1998 and decided
to run again when his term expires, he will again face election in the year
2004. The correct option for the question is option “b”. Any Senator of US once
elected remains as a Senator for a period of 6 years. After this period he can
again stand in the election and get elected for another 6 years. No Senator can
remain as a Senator after 6 years have passed as this is the law laid down in
the US constitution.
Answer:
The New England colonies had rocky soil, which was not suited to plantation farming, so the New England colonies depended on fishing, lumbering, and subsistence farming. The Middle colonies also featured mixed economies, including farming and merchant shipping.
Explanation:
