Answer:
Number of families that should be surveyed if one wants to be 90% sure of being able to estimate the true mean PSLT within 0.5 is at least 43.
Step-by-step explanation:
 We are given that one wants to estimate the mean PSLT for the population of all families in New York City with gross incomes in the range $35.000 to $40.000. 
If sigma equals 2.0, we have to find that how many families should be surveyed if one wants to be 90% sure of being able to estimate the true mean PSLT within 0.5.
Here, we will use the concept of Margin of error as the statement "true mean PSLT within 0.5" represents the margin of error we want.
<u></u>
<u>SO, Margin of error formula is given by;</u>
        Margin of error =   
 
where,  = significance level = 10%
 = significance level = 10%
              = standard deviation = 2.0
 = standard deviation = 2.0
             n = number of families 
Now, in the z table the critical value of x at 5% (  ) level of significance is 1.645.
 ) level of significance is 1.645.
SO,        Margin of error =   
 
                           0.5   =   
 
                           
 
                          
                            n  =   
 
                                = 43.3 ≈ 43 
Therefore, number of families that should be surveyed if one wants to be 90% sure of being able to estimate the true mean PSLT within 0.5 is at least 43.
 
        
             
        
        
        
A.900/10=90 therefore, 10% of the garden will be covered moss roses so that transfers to 90 square feet 
B.900 square feet is equal to 25% of the garden so 900x4=3600 therefore, the area of the yard in square feet could either be 30x120, 60x60, or 180x20
        
             
        
        
        
The answer for this question is 4.
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
 .
.
Step-by-step explanation:
We want to convert the function into the form that let's us easily find the x-intercept, and it would be for the form  because then we can find the x-intercept in the following manner:
 because then we can find the x-intercept in the following manner: 



We factor our function  and get
 and get
 
Now this form let's us easily find the x-intercepts:


and so we pick the second choice: f(x)=(2x+1)(2x-1).
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
respuesta:primero verdadero
segundo : no