The correct answer in this case is liberalism.
Socialism is the opposite as it entails (Among other things) the idea of fast changes, if need be with revolution. Neither does utilitarianism talk about social progress through reform.
Libertarians talk exactly about what the question is about; one of the main tennets of liberalism is that they prefer and would like to witness social change through reforms.
Answer:
What he said: I write an argumentative letter in which he commented on an opinion that accused our civilization of closing in, and through which it became clear that the Islamic civilization contributed to the advancement of nations and interacted with them.
Explanation:
Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union was the first constitution of the United States.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the one having to do with the fact that ideas are far more easily spread throughout the world due to the spread of technology and the Internet. </span></span>
The only dependent clause in the passage: <u>who has done some useful work dies.</u>
ANSWER: The underlined dependent clause in the sentences above acts as <u>adjective clause. </u>
An adjective clause always follows the person, place, thing or situation they describe, begins with a relative pronoun (which, that, who, whom, whose), a relative adverb (where, when, why), or a zero relative and has a verb.
In this case, the dependent clause acts as an adjective clause because it describes the noun in the sentence "Anyone in our ranks", the clause is essential to tell who "anyone in our rank" is. It also begins with a relative pronoun ("who") and has a verb ("is").
