Answer:
2-It was bombed due to acts of war towards japan and dropped a five-ton bomb over the Japanese city of Hiroshima.. And then three more days later nagasaki was bombed which killed tremendous amount of people
3-They accept defeat 10 days later and they had to because if they didn't they will drop more bombs which encouraged them to accept defeat The surrender ceremony was held on September 2, aboard the United States Navy battleship, at which officials from the japanese government signed the Japanese instrument of surrender
4-The Manhattan project was started because German scientists had been working on a weapon using nuclear technologies and that Adolf Hitler was prepared to use it.The Manhattan Project was the code name for the American-led effort to develop a functional atomic weapon during World War II
5-During that time president Truman was accountable for everything but his main focus was not to attack civilization/agriculture but was entitled to destroy Japan's ability to make war.
6-No, they were not. The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified at the time as being moral and this was not attended to using weapons knowing that it would kill civilians and destroy the urban milieu and it was clearly not mortal for the act of thought
Explanation:
Diplomatically, President Truman's decision to use the atomic bomb in Japan may have been partially motivated by his desire to limit the involvement of the Soviet Union in the Pacific War.
President Harry Truman, was the 33rd President of the United States of America, who was in office during World War II, when he decided to use atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The main motivation for the attack was to get back on Japan after the Pearl Harbor attack, but some may argue that it was also a demonstration of power to drive other nations away from combat with the United States.
1) ariel spying over Cuba produced pictures that showed missile silos being built in Cuba. The design of the silos made it clear they were designed for missiles, and it made no sense for Cuba to put in anything less than nuclear missiles there. Missiles they could not build themselves, so had to come from the Soviet Union.
2) Only minutes. A launch from the Soviet Union to the US only takes about 20 minutes. Depending on the range of the missiles put into the silos, warning time would have been anywhere from 3-10 minutes. Not enough time to verify that it was a launch, and not a detection system malfunction, forcing America to launch immediately, or risk losing its capacity to strike back.
3) A direct attack or invasion of Cuba would have forced the Soviet Union to respond in kind. The USSR simply could not abandon Cuba, without losing all credibility among its allies and vassal states. So they would likely have struck back at the US, probably in Europe. This would have dangerously escalated the tensions, and increased the probability of nuclear war. Other officials believed that a quick,determined strike would not only eliminate the immediate threat of missiles in Cuba, but possibly overthrow the regime and force the USSR to accept the situation. The idea of a naval blockade was a compromise position. A threat of force, but one that allowed the USSR to back off. After all, so long as the missiles were not put into the silos, they were no threat.
Cancel culture hasn't taken a huge effect on history other than "canceling" figures such as Christopher Columbus. Multiple monuments have been toppled or graffitied on that represent the dark spots in history, such as confederate leaders, colonizers, etc. Though the context in history books have not changed as much. Removing history from the books is no the responsibility of cancel culture. Cancel culture could be a possible threat to learning true history and how we came to be. We must learn true history to not make the same mistakes we did in the past. History will repeat itself.
