Question

What best describes the contrast between the narrative structures of Version 1 and Version 2?

Answer 1

The versions are given below:

Version 1: I took a long, lingering look at the tremendous beauty that surrounded me. Nature abounded as far as the eye could see, and the only sounds to be heard were the peaceful murmurs of that which existed in the wilderness. As I sat there, my tent and sleeping bag the only signs of civilization for miles, my heart swelled with relief that I had decided to take this weekend camping trip. I could feel every muscle in my body gradually relaxing with every sight, every sound, every smell within this untouched slice of tranquility. It was hard to believe that anything could disrupt the serenity of this place . . . but I could not have been more wrong.

Version 2: Exhausted, I took one last look around me. I had been camping for only two short days, but I could not wait to get home and recount the adventures of my short stay in peace and tranquility. Hoisting my backpack onto my back, I grabbed my canteen and began the long trek back to my car. The question was not which story I should tell, but rather which one I should tell first.

We could through the options because it would be a comfortable way to answer this question. It is better to begin with the second version. Second version begins with the conclusion. Then, we are left with two options-first and third one. And if we pay attention to the first version, it is a chronological order of the actions. Therefore, the correct answer is the first option -  Version 1 uses chronological order, building up to the action. Version 2 starts with the conclusion to make readers curious about the beginning.

Answer 2

The best answer for this question would be:

 

Version 1 uses chronological order, building up to the action. Version 2 starts with the conclusion to make readers curious about the beginning. 

 

It is always a great idea to introduce ideas in an order, for the readers to understand the content of the work.