1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksivusya [100]
3 years ago
8

The Supreme Court ruled in in re Gault that people that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement who cannot

afford an attorney must be provided one by the state accused of crimes have the right to a second trial upon request under arrest as juveniles have many of the same rights as adults
Social Studies
2 answers:
natka813 [3]3 years ago
8 0
This is the most logical answer  <span>that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement</span>
AlladinOne [14]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Your answer is D

I took the test and got it right

Explanation:

The 14th Amendment—not just for adults anymore. In the case of in re Gault, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that “neither the 14th Amendment nor the Bill of Rights is for adults alone.” That means the Constitutional rights of juvenile suspects are now protected, just as they are for legal adults.

You might be interested in
Revisit your prediction from part B of the Hypothesis and Observations section of this task. Now that you've seen images showing
Valentin [98]
I could help you gave more context.
3 0
2 years ago
The United States did NOT want Japan to follow in the footsteps of China and Vietnam and set up a _________ government.
Gelneren [198K]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Expansion of Demand is shift in demand or what ?​
xxTIMURxx [149]

Hmmmmmmmm?? ig it is..i dunno ?

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the system of the amendments do for the constitution? Choose all that apply
MrRissso [65]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court ruled that state law
ki77a [65]

Answer:

In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution to create the Second Bank of the United States and that the state of Maryland lacked the power to tax the Bank.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Discuss a solution to the problem of america’s dependence on illegal immigrant labor in agriculture
    7·1 answer
  • What is usually the relationship between a bond’s rating and the interest rate a company pays to buyers?
    12·2 answers
  • The British Parliament, the United States Congress, and the California State Assembly are all examples of what?
    14·1 answer
  • If Christopher is an unpaid, stay-at-home father who works as a volunteer at the local Habitat for Humanity chapter. Currently,
    11·1 answer
  • Who wrote Uncle Toms Cabin
    5·2 answers
  • Was sometimes used
    14·1 answer
  • What is another word for a pyramid shaped temple tower? <br> Ok
    11·1 answer
  • Hellooo dhciheidsajqh
    12·2 answers
  • Which correctly summarizes aspects of Jeffersonian Democracy?
    9·1 answer
  • How did the arrival of the Mongols affect Russia? A) Russia quickly defeated and ousted the Mongols B) The Mongols brought Asia
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!