Answer:
suggestibility
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that this is an example of the term known as suggestibility. This term refers to the quality of an individual describing their inclination to accept and act on the suggestions or opinions of those around them. Such as in this case since the police officers mentioned that the girl had a blue shirt , is gave Alex the inclination to believe the girl was actually wearing a blue shirt when testifying.
The Great Depression of America!
It all began with the economic recession in August 1929, but everything got worst on October 24th, 1929: The Black Thursday, or the Crash of Wall Street, Which affected all the world. Then a year later, Banks began to fail. The economy was dead, not only for the united states, but for the whole world. It stayed like that till World war 2 in 1939.
Those aspects of a person that are regarded as important to a
sense of self-identity and self-enhancement are what Allport called the
proprium.
<span>Gordon Willard Allport (an American psychologist) was one of
the first psychologists who studied about the personality or we can say
personality psychology<span>. Allport says that personality is the dynamic organization
within the individual.</span></span>
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
Low context communication can be described as a more explicit and direct approach to sending a message.
Low-context communication is explicit and can hardly be inferred. The recipient may understand all the information, even if they are not familiar with the cultural background. Low-context communication is more common in individualist societies. Low-context communicators need to pay special attention to non-verbal messages and gestures, face savings and ingenuity, and building good relationships over time.
With low-context communication, connections can be established relatively quickly. People are expected to ask each other personal questions and be more open about their intentions.
Know more about Low-context communication here
brainly.com/question/6737104
#SPJ4
