Answer:
??????
Explanation:
this is a poem u cant change it
Answer:
Three little pigs spark off into the actual world to find their fortune. After all of them move off, they all meet a person with both straw, furze (sticks), or bricks. The first pig builds his house out of straw, and the wolf comes alongside asking him to allow him in. The pig says no, and the wolf blows down the house and eats the pig. The second pigs builds his residence out of furze, which can be sticks, and just like the first pig, the wolf comes along asking him to open his door. When the pig declines the wolf blows down the residence and eats the pig. Finally the wolf is going to the 1/3 pigs residence and once more asks if he can go inside, however whilst the pig says no, the wolf tries to blow down the house. When he fails he asks the pig if he wants to visit a area of turnips inside the morning at a certain time. The pig agrees, but within the morning he is going to the field an hour in advance than planned. When the wolf realizes what he has done, he asks the pig to move somewhere inside the morning again at a positive time. This happens two more instances before the wolf attempts to head down the chimney, where the pig has a boiling pot of water hanging over a fire. The wolf drops into it
Answer:
Feldman reaches the conclusion that most people are honest without receiving an incentive by
studying a counterclaim about morality and arriving at a broad generalization.
Explanation:
A researcher can reach a conclusion that most people are honest after studying a counterclaim about morality. He can then arrive at a broad generalization.
A counterclaim is the opposite of an argument, or simply, the opposing argument. A counterclaim research is one undertaken to establish that the opposite of a research situation prevails. It is a claim made against a situation or an established position in order to rebut the claimed position.
In this instance, Glaucon had taken a position that no man could resist the temptation of evil if he knew his acts could not be witnessed or dictated. For Feldman to contradict this claim, with a conclusion that 87% of the time, a man could resist the temptation of evil even if he knew his acts could not be witnessed or dictated because he had become invisible, it means that he had researched the counterclaim.
This is true. I hope I could help :D.
Have a great rest of the day.
How has society changed in the last 20 years due to the rise of new technology being manufactured?
