This question illustrates DNA profiling within forensics. Here, a DNA<span> 'fingerprint' is obtained from a biological sample at a crime scene. This 'fingerprint' can be compared to profiles obtained from </span>DNA of individual suspects<span> or criminal DNA profiles stored on a database. In this case, </span><span>suspect iii is likely the perpetrator of the crime as his/her DNA profile matches that of the sample left at the crime scene. </span>
Answer:
C. Bone fusion
B. Skull sutures
Explanation:
When lacking information about the age of a specimen, you can apply different techniques using the skeleton to find out the approximate age of the individual.
Usually, teeth are useful in determining the age of the specimens. But in some species, age determination through these structures is not easy. It requires laboratory elements and a high degree of precision.
Another way to determine the age of an individual is by analyzing the fusion degree of different bones.
Let us think about the skull of an animal or a person. It is composed of many bones that fit all together in a perfect way. Each bone is closely related to the adjacent ones and is usually involved in the same functions -feeding, breathing, hearing, among others-. The limits between these bones are the <u>suture lines</u>.
In the early post-natal stages, these bones are free. They fit all together, but they are not fused. But with time, they begin a fusion process that completes in adulthood. This fusion process occurs in the sutures.
As a general pattern, groups of bones with the same function get fused at the same time. Each group develops and fuses in a particular chronological sequence and is related to the adaptation to the environment and the biological habits.
The degree of fusion of the suture is a reliable indicator to differentiate age stages.
Answer:
disrupt habitats that native species depend upon
Explanation:
(1) provide food for native bird species
(2) can carry diseases that can be spread to pets
(3) increase biodiversity in New York State forests
(4) disrupt habitats that native species depend
upon
The insects have the potential to cause an upset in the natural ecosystem because their destruction of native hemlock trees leads to the automatic destruction of the habitats of several native species.
<em>Trees generally function to provide habitats for many plant and animal species. Their destructions mean that these habitats would be destroyed and the species they harbor would become displaced. Displacement of species from their natural habitat can cause an upset to the ecosystem.</em>
Answer:
Both depends on one another.
Explanation:
Yes, there is a direct relationship between the number of pollinating plants and the number of honeybees because honeybees are insects that are responsible for pollination in the flowering plants. The population of flowering plants also has a great effect on the survival of honeybees because these flowering plants provides food in the form of nectar on which these honeybees survive and make honey from it. So we can say that both flowering plants and honeybees depends on one another for the successful growth and development.
Explanation:
Yo Is it giving birth I think it should be
