Answer:
The book may be introductory, but it can satisfy a scholar.
Explanation:
In any argument presentation be it in an academic paper or any book for that matter, the presence of any phrases like "sound lines' ' will show an emphasis on the fact that the presented argument is to a certain extent, true and has validation. At the same time, the words "amply provide" will imply that the sources or argument presented is enough to prove the given point. These two phrases thus, help make the argument that the given points may be introductory but at the same time, they can also satisfy a scholar's viewpoint.
Answer:
I think that those two men are being put in a box full of stuffing for an experiment.
I hope this helps you.
Answer:Why do Jessie Prescott and her parents eat macaroni and chesse so often.
Explanation:
Answer:
Answer is in the explanation.
Explanation:
In grammatically correct sentences, subject and verb must agree in person (first, second, third) and in number (singular, plural). The given passage has three disagreements:
1) ...<em>the fate of the diamond were unknown</em>...
Since <em>the fate</em> is third-person singular it needs to be followed by a verb <em>was
</em>
2) <em>neither men or conflict have dimmed...
</em>
It is a general rule that when we have a neither/nor (either/or) construction, the verb agrees with the closest subject ( in this case<em> the conflict</em>) which is in the third person singular, so it needs to be followed by the verb<em> has</em>
3) ... <em>the twin eighty-year-old brothers suggests.</em>..
The subject here is<em> the twin brothers</em> (they) which is third person plural, so the following verb must be <em>suggest</em>
