The Supreme Court said Mr. Reynolds could not break the law while practicing his religion.
Reynolds v. the United States was heard by the Supreme Court in 1878 in regard the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act placed on the Utah Territory.
Reynolds argued that preventing him to marry more than one woman was a violation of his First Amendment rights to protection of religion. The Supreme Court concluded that he had the right to his belief but he could not go around the law to practice his faith. The law stated marriage was to be between two people only and therefore he could not be married to more than one woman.
D. It is the only answer that states why the beginning of the statement is negative for the democratic process
Answer:
china and taiwan, they have grown in mass and the challange's they face today is earthquakes,ect..
Explanation:research
to make war and give away places which in plain terms is too empoverish the nation
This question seems to be incomplete. However, there´s enough information to find the right answer.
Answer:
1. The disfranchisement of African Americans.
2. The establishment of a civil inferiority status for African Americans.
3. The decrease in educational aid for African Americans
Explanation:
In The Souls of Black Folk (Chicago, 1903), W. E. B. Du Bois reacts to a speech by Washington, accusing him of calling for the submission of African Americans through conciliation, Du Bois explains that the reduced stress on the fight for political rights for African Americans that had occurred during the past 15 years had created the aforementioned effects.
