I am not sure if I am understanding this correctly but I will answer it in the way I understood it and if it’s not what you meant I’m so sorry.
I don’t think that there is anything wrong with people changing their point of views on things especially as they become more educated on the subject or just change their mind overtime. There is a big issue tho with how people react to others changing their point of view. I think this anger comes from peoples need to have what people say to us be set in stone and if it changes our brains can’t comprehend that. I think it subconsciously makes people think well they said this and changed their mind so they will either lie to me again or just stop talking to me.
This can be seen in a simpler example of a friend leaving one group for another. This can make their persons new friend group really guarded against the person because they already expect them to leave.
Once again if this was not what you meant I apologize
13 I believe!! Sorry if I’m wrong!!
Answer:Which role in the government of the Roman Republic was similar to that of the president of the United States?
Consuls
The political structure of the Roman Republic consisted of three branches: consuls, the Senate and assemblies. Consuls were the executives of the government, much like the president of the United States.
Explanation:
HERE IS YOUR ANSWER
Answer:
The supremacy clause of the United States constitution established is that ‘The U.S. Constitution and federal treaties, laws, and regulations are the supreme law of the land.’
Explanation:
This supremacy clause suffices over all laws in America in the case where their is conflict this law will prevail over.
