1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Citrus2011 [14]
3 years ago
11

The largest Vietnamese population in the United States is in​

History
2 answers:
kakasveta [241]3 years ago
8 0

San Jose, California with 106,992

This is according to the 2016 census. Large cities in large states, such as California, usually have the largest population of immigrants and their families.

Jlenok [28]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: Orange County, CA,

Explanation:

Orange County, CA, had the largest Vietnamese population, 183,766,

You might be interested in
What was George Washington's height?
AnnZ [28]
George washington was 6 feet 2 inches tall.
7 0
3 years ago
What is one reason citizens can more easily influence government at
Anna71 [15]

Answer:

I'm pretty sure it's C

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Use your notes to write a paragraph comparing and contrasting the effects of world war 2 on civilians in the soviet union, the u
vovangra [49]


I believe the Cold War between US and Soviet Union began after World war II. Both countries have a mutual distrust of each other primarily due to a couple of reasons. The Soviet Union leader's Stalin at the time had a tyrannical and communism tendencies in ruling Soviet Union and his post war communism expansion efforts in Eastern Europe made the US feared the Soviet Union had intention to control the part of Eastern Europe. It became foreign policy for US to contain Soviet Union communism expansion tendencies. The Cold War resulted to both countries competitiveness on arms race and space race.

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is the clearest example of government affecting the lives of citizens at the state level?
ivann1987 [24]
I would say laws defining the crime of treason... but don't hold me to that
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Choose a current issue that relates to the protection of individual rights. Write an argument that makes a claim related to whet
Romashka [77]

Answer:

Thesis: Mill argues that it is in the best interest of society to promote individuality which ensures  liberty over using authority to conform subjects to a particular type of person conducive to  following orders.

Definitions

Liberty: Mill defines Liberty using three basic criteria developed on page 15.

1. An individual maintains the ability to freely think and feel on all subjects and may  express their thoughts,

2. An individual maintains the ability to freely frame their own life according to their tastes  and preferences regardless of public opinion, providing that their choices do not harm  others.

3. An individual maintains the ability to freely unite with other free individuals, providing that  the purpose of uniting is not the harm of others.  Clearly, individual rights are closely tied to Liberty. Using this definition of Liberty, Mill links the  protection of certain individual rights to Liberty.

Arguments

Argument 1: Opinions (pg. 22-23 & 43)

Promoting individuality leads to a multitude of opinions which creates a broad dialogue  where opinions and discussed and refined until they become uncontested truths. Only by  listening to all sides of an issue can one be wise and reach an uncontested truth. Mill  furthers that “the well-being of mankind may almost be measured by the number and  gravity of the truths which have reached the point of being uncontested.” The opinions  and dialogue associated with individuality will therefore increase progress. It follows that maintaining individuality is in the best interest of society so that uncontested truths, and  subsequently progress, may be increased.

Argument 2: Individuality builds character in a society (pg 59)

Mill argues that the expression of an individual’s desires and impulses define a person’s  character. He further claims that “one whose desires and impulses are not his own, has  no character, no more than a steam engine has character.” Society in turn benefits from  strong characters. Mill argues that society needs people of strong characters in order to  progress. Therefore, by preferring individuality, society builds character which helps general welfare.

Argument 3: Individuality is required for the progression of society (pg. 62-63)Mill claims that “individuality is the same thing [as] development, and that it is only the  cultivation of individuality which produces… well-developed human beings.” This is  because the originality comes from individuals directing their own life which is needed for  progress (like discovering new truths or challenge old truths.) As Mill contends, “genius  can only breathe freely in an atmosphere of freedom.” Without these geniuses, “human  life would be a stagnant pool.” By linking it to progress, it is clear that society can  effectively better itself through individuality.

Counter Arguments

There are two type of counter-arguments that are anticipated to our claim that society is better  off to promote individuality. The first is that the role of society is not best spent focusing on promoting liberty. The second is that individuality does not benefit society.

Counter-Argument 1: Role of Society is to use Authority to control subject Instead of how Mill defines the role of society as cultivating individualism, one might  argue that the role of society is to use authority to coerce subjects. Past philosophers  like Hobbes argued that it is best for subjects to be under a powerful sovereign. One  may argue that the role of society is not to cultivate individuality, but rather use authority  to suppress individuality for the best interest of society.

Counter-Argument 2: Calvinistic Theory (pg. 61)

Mill presents the case that one may argue that human nature is not good. In this case,  society would only be hurting itself by trying to cultivate individuality. This falls in line with  Calvinistic Theory that human’s main objective is to obey God’s command and that  human nature is corrupt. This would mean that it would be detrimental for society to try  to promote individuality since it impedes human’s main purpose.

Counter-Argument 3: Customs

Similar to the arguments presented by Tocqueville, one may argue that customs are an  important part of maintaining a society. The type of individualism that Mill argues for  diminishes the power of customs because it begs people to challenge customs with  individual thought. People like Tocqueville may argue that individuality is bad because it  diminishes the role customs.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did geography influence the development of the southern colonies and northern colonies?
    10·1 answer
  • How did the violence and destruction of World War I influence artistic
    10·1 answer
  • How did the Opium Wars affect China?
    7·2 answers
  • Who profited from the African Slave Trade?
    9·2 answers
  • A serious toll was taken on Native Americans from the advancing American settlers, the loss of hunting ground, forced movement,
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a French colony?
    15·2 answers
  • In 1637 colonists killed between 500 and 600 American Indians in connecticut during ?
    6·2 answers
  • With which of the following statements would Tecumseh most likely agree?
    8·1 answer
  • PLS HELP ME WILL GIVE BRAIN THINGYYY
    9·1 answer
  • What does this political cartoon say about conditions in France under the
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!