Okay so i know women supplied the troops, organized fundraising drives, and worked as nurses for the wounded soldiers. this could impact the outcome because it could mean less casualties with the women providing care and offering supplies to battle the cold and other forces of nature (not sure if that would work but it possibly could). during the revolutionary war women also acted as spies which could prove very beneficial because they could host british soldiers in their homes and tell the american soldiers of where the british were planning to attack (on a side note this was also good because no one suspected women of being able to spy and do things such as that). hope this helped!
In the treaty Britain<span>, conceding to primary American grievances, </span>agreed<span> to evacuate the Northwest Territory by June 1, 1796; to compensate for its depredations against American shipping; to end discrimination against American commerce; and to grant the U.S. trading privileges in </span>England<span> and the </span>British<span> East Indies.</span>
Isolationism is independence from the needs of other countries, people, groups, etc.
I assume that you are talking about security in the sense of police or national defense.
In a pure free market system, you would have no overall police force or army. These things (this kind of security) are called "public goods" because they are things that everyone gets use from. In other words, the army can't protect me without protecting my next-door neighbor. For that reason, there's no way an army could be profitable and so no private company would produce an army (it couldn't tell my neighbor "we'll stop protecting you from the Russians if you don't pay your army bill").
Public goods will only be produced if the government produces them. So security (except for things like private security guards) will not exist in a pure free market economy.
