Answer:
He hoped to strike a decisive blow to the Allies and convince them to negotiate for peace before fresh troops could arrive.
All through the 17 century, the Colonies had no legitimate government or control. The states were private endeavors with sanctions from the British government; however, nothing came in the method for the supervision of help in light of political strife in Great Britain.
After the chaos over the government was settled, Britain had been changed into a Constitutional Monarchy in which the crown and Parliament together dominated. England currently ended up more grounded and increasingly incorporated.
In Gothic architecture, there would always be a pointed arch and a ribbed vault, as well as a flying buttress. The entire place would have numerous carvings of great artistic value that would only point out even more how great of a building it would be, since it was one of the primary goals of Gothic builders, making things huge and imposing.
I would've enjoyed because becoming a master builder for such a project means that the government of the country trusts you to be skillful enough to create such a massive building with huge historic importance and this would only mean that they have you in high esteem and respect you. It would be something like the cherry on top of an amazing architectural career.
C. the liberation of Paris.
The people of Paris are gathered around celebrating.
Hope this helps ฅ^•ﻌ•^ฅ
Answer:
In general the sociocultural process in which the sense and consciousness of association with one national and cultural group changes to identification with another such group, so that the merged individual or group may partially or totally lose its original national identity. Assimilation can occur and not only on the unconscious level in primitive societies. It has been shown that even these societies have sometimes developed specific mechanisms to facilitate assimilation, e.g., adoption; mobilization, and absorption into the tribal fighting force; exogamic marriage; the client relationship between the tribal protector and members of another tribe. In more developed societies, where a stronger sense of cultural and historical identification has evolved, the mechanisms, as well as the automatic media of assimilation, become more complicated. The reaction of the assimilator group to the penetration of the assimilated increasingly enters the picture.
Various factors may combine to advance or hinder the assimilation process. Those actively contributing include the position of economic strength held by a group; the political advantages to be gained from adhesion or separation; acknowledged cultural superiority; changes in religious outlook and customs; the disintegration of one group living within another more cohesive group; the development of an "open society" by either group. Added to these are external factors, such as changes in the demographic pattern (mainly migration) or those wrought by revolution and revolutionary attitudes. Sociologists have described the man in process of assimilation as "the marginal man," both attracted and repelled by the social and cultural spheres in which he lives in a state of transition.
Explanation:
