Otto von Bismark was the most responsible for the unification of Germany and he did it with nationalism.
Argument:
<em>The creation of the Constitution represented a remarkable example of constructive compromise because</em><u> it is a compromise between the government and the people, that states that people should act in a certain way to maintain peace and that the government should protect the people's interests and rights. </u>
A historical example that proves that the Constitution represented an example of constructive compromise is the Three - Fifths Compromise, where the framers of the Constitution reached to an agreement to represent three out of every five slaves in a state to determine their total population for legislative representation and taxes purposes. This Compromise was constructive because both slave states that had little free population and free states with a bigger population would be equally represented by the United States House of Representatives by the next ten years.
Answer:It would give the federal government too much power over state matters
Explanation: Hope this helps:)
Answer:
Cyrus the Great was the founder of the Achaemenian Empire. His empire, stretching from the Aegean Sea to the Indus River, was the largest that had ever existed at the time of his rule. Cyrus pieced his kingdom together using a mixture of conquest and diplomacy, attesting to his skills as a warrior and a statesman.
Explanation:
We have to remember that there was a big difference between the treaties themselves and the paper documents that European-Americans used to record those treaties. For many Native Americans, a treaty was an oral agreement between governments. It was methodically memorized and often sealed with an exchange of gifts. In the eastern part of North America, wampum belts (which were shells strung together to create images) served as official records of these treaties, and were draped over a speaker's body when the treaty was being recited later on, much as Europeans might read aloud the text of a written agreement between two European countries.
For Natives, the oral agreement, along with these wampum belts, WERE the treaty, and the paper document they signed was just some odd European habit that they often simply tolerated. Many of the Native leaders who signed these treaties could not read what they were signing, and even if they could they did not recognize the documents as being the official record of what was agreed on.
