Answer:
tupac Amaru Shaku is his only name and it can not be changed because he is dead
Explanation:
Answer:
The Prohibition Party was founded in 1869 for the purpose of preventing the manufacturing and sale of alcoholic beverages in the United States. The Prohibition Party is an example of a party that has one goal.
Explanation:
The Prohibition Party is a political party of the United States of America. As its name indicates, it advocates the prohibition of the consumption of alcoholic beverages and is an integral part of the Movement for Temperance. Although at present it is not an important grouping, it had some repercussion at the end of the 19th century and in the first years of the 20th century.
The greatest party success was achieved in 1919, with the sanction of the 18th amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which prohibited the production, sale, transportation, import and export of alcohol, although this measure was repealed in 1933.
The correct answer is A. Doing good deeds is not a means to salvation.
Martin Luther and John Calvin did not believe that salvation came from good deeds. They thought according to the Bible says in the book of Romans that salvation is by grace and through faith but good deeds are just part of a behavior of a person who is already saved.
Http://www.ushistory.org/us/20b.asp
https://www.chegg.com/tutors/US-History-questions/Jefferson-Did-Thomas-Jefferson-live-up-to-his-own-political-ideals-of-less-government-and-strict-constructionism-during-his-two-terms-in-the-presidency-Discuss-whether-he-did-or-did-not-and-cite-specific-examples-as-evidence-Some-say-Jefferson-led-a-life---Y990U/
if you need more information.
here's the answer to the question to save you time: ( from a history tutor)
Did Thomas Jefferson live up to his own political ideals of less government and "strict constructionism" during his two terms in the presidency? Discuss whether he did or did not and cite specific examples as evidence. Some say Jefferson led a life of contradictions. When is it acceptable for a president to make a complete turnabout, or compromise, in the ideals they strongly define themselves by? Do you see any examples of this with modern-era presidents in our history? Explain.
Thomas Jefferson did live up to his own political ideals, with the exception of a few key events. He was a strong believer in strict constructionism, so to him, the Constitution was to be applied as written. Although he was in Paris at the time of the Constitutional Convention, he kept in close contact with those attending. Jefferson was a mentor to James Madison, the author of the Federalist Papers, and the Constitution, so his ideals had a strong impact. Although Jefferson was a strong supporter strict constructionism, some of his presidential choices do not reflect these ideals. One of the most well known and controversial deals ever made would be the Louisiana Purchase. This defied strict constructionism in every way, but was made in the best interest of the growing population, as well as the national economy. This is very unusual because typically, presidents do not expand their power unless there is a national crisis, or the country is at war. This is generally when it is accepted and almost expected of them. Many presidents in the modern era are full of contradictions such as Jefferson’s, Democrats and Republicans alike. A good example is from our current president Barack Obama. In his original campaign, he took leverage from the fact that George W. Bush had more executive orders than most presidents when in fact, President Obama has now surpassed him. While this is not as impactful as doubling the size of the country, the principle remains the same.
