The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
Answer:
A SUPERPOWER I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE
I have always been intrigued by the idea of time travel ever since i was a little child. I watched cartoons about characters that could move through dimensions and go back to the past to change something or enter the future to get something.
The superpower i would like to have is the ability to time travel partly because i would love to travel to the past and witness the things i can only read in books. I would love to meet Jesus and know the kind of man he was, i would also want to meet Julius Caesar and ask him some questions about how he was able to lead a vast empire such as the Roman empire. I would also be a great honor to meet Thomas Edison and ask him how he persevered even after he kept failing at his experiments before he eventually succeeded.
It would be really cool to have this superpower because i can relive my past and also move into the future, for sure, it would be exciting.
