The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Here there is no question, just a sentence. What is your question?
Trying to help we did some deep research and can comment on the following.
The question that is missing is this: "Which of the following is most likely a lens he is exploring?" And unfortunately, you also forgot to include the options for this question.
As part of his research on the Civil War, Charlie is reading a book about ironclads (a type of boat) and how they revolutionized naval warfare. The lens. Which of the following is most likely a lens he is exploring?
Answer: the lens of technology.
This is correct because ironclads were a major advancement in the technology of war. Ironclads were modern ships for the time that used steam to move, They were constructed in 1859 and played an important part during the actions of the American Civil War.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the seocnd choice "constatinople was captured by the Ottomans"
On May 29, 1453, after an Ottoman army stormed Constantinople, Mehmed triumphantly entered the Hagia Sophia, which would become the city's leading mosque. Emperor Constantine XI died in battle that day, and the decline and fall<span> of the </span>Byzantine Empire<span> was complete.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
Answer:
Crusaders made their way to the Holy Land by whatever means they could. Many went by land, and many went by sea. ... Most Crusaders went over land to Constantinople. There, they split in two, with some of the forces marching across Anatolia and others following the coast in ships until they reached the port of Acre.
Explanation:
I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
It looked like Europe now. But It was calmer back then before WW1
