When Shmuel recounts his journey on the train, he describes a horrible situation, which was completely different from Bruno's experience on his train ride. Shmuel tells Bruno that the cars were overcrowded to the point that passengers could not breathe. In contrast, Bruno recalls that there were two trains at the station when he left Berlin and naively believes that Shmuel boarded the wrong train. Even though Shmuel tries to explain to Bruno that the train he boarded had no doors, Bruno contradicts Shmuel and does not understand why Shmuel had such a negative experience on the train. Bruno and Shmuel's different perspectives are significant because they depict the contrast between those in authority (Nazis) and those in subjugation (Jews). Since Bruno is a German Nazi, he is treated with respect and enjoys a relatively comfortable train ride. In contrast, the Jewish prisoners, like Shmuel, were subjected to the horrible conditions of the tightly packed cattle cars that took them to concentration camps. Their differing perspectives further illuminates the difference in their backgrounds and situations. Despite Bruno and Shmuel's drastically different circumstances, the two boys become close friends.
Answer:
Drugs are not a huge topic in school because it is not healthy for anyone to do. All schools are a drug-free zone to keep the kids safe from second hand smoking because it is proven that second hand smoking is more deadly then that person smoking (which is one way drugs can be used) because the person is not immune to the toxins in your body as they are. It can cause heart failure and many other side affects, may resulting in death. It is not something that schools want to promote in a school, just for the fact that they want to the students go far in life and not have to die at a young age because of nicotine use or any other kind of drugs, that is not want a school was built for.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
<span>`It lends a sense of believability to the absurd events, allowing the reader to suspend their disbelief. I would say this is the effect of the narration, to make the hitting on the head seem believable especially using the analogy of the fly and also his remorse at hitting the man.</span>
