Answer:
The correct option here is A) languages and images used in the advertising for this audience often rely on esoteric terminology.
Explanation:
When the target audience is group of professionals like lawyers, doctors and teachers etc then, the advertiser should rely on esoteric terminology. Here esoteric means something that is to be understood by only professionals who have some specialized knowledge, if this type of terminology is used with normal public than everything that advertiser is saying is gonna go over the head of the public, so therefore this type of terminology is used when the audience is group of professionals.
Answer: False
Explanation:
A tariff is a tax that is imposed by the government of a particular country in order to curtail the number of imported goods brought into the country.
Based on the above scenario, the reduction in consumer surplus is not $500 million but rather $600 million which is the addition of $100 million, $200 million and $300 million.
Therefore the question is false.
Answer:
A. No, because Ahmed is not a merchant.
Explanation:
Implied warranty of merchantability is a law in contract which states that when there is a transaction between a seller (the merchant), and a buyer, there is an unwritten guarantee from the seller, that the product meets up to the ordinary standards of care. This means that the goods must be fit to do what the merchant says it will do. Therefore, if the seller finds it defective, he could return it to the seller. and if the seller refuses to make a change, a legal case could be established. The merchant by law is a wholesaler or retailer, who sells goods in which he has expertise or special skills.
Ahmed in the question could be argued in court to not be a merchant of cars and as such, has no expertise with which he can make a guarantee for the car being sold to Carlos.
Answer:
It tells on how he or she can improve his ways of training based on the previous people he or she trained feedbacks.
Answer:
The answer is Duress.
Explanation:
Duress is a term in law used to justify a wrong action but excluding murder cases.
For a defendant to successfully prove he or she acted under duress, the following must be satisfied:
1. The defendant is in an immediate danger that could lead to death. For example, if Dreyfus shoots Eton by refusing, he can shoot Eton to death.
2. There is a believe that the defendant will be will be hurt
3. There is no option to avoid the harm or being hurt other than to succumb to doing the illegal action.
