Answer:
1. Accounts receivable due = Accounts receivable + Allowances
2008
= 760,100 + 26,259
= $786,359
2009
= 840,810 + 23,936
= $864,746
2. Amount of receivable written off = Beginning balance for Allowance for doubtful accounts + Bad debt - Closing balance for allowance for doubtful accounts
= 9,200 + 3,400 - 9,148
= $3,452
3. Gross sales = Net Sales + Sales returns
Sales Returns = Closing balance for reserve for product returns + goods returned - Opening balance for reserve for product returns
= 14,788 + 3,440 - 17,059
= $1,169
Gross sales in 2009 = 6,244,800 + 1,169
= $6,245,969
4. Cash collected = Credit Sales - Goods returned - Bad debts written off - Ending receivables balance + Beginning receivables balance
= 6,245,969 - 3,440 - 3,452 - 864,746 + 786,359
= $6,160,690
Answer:
c. debit to Payroll Tax Expense for $1,050.
Explanation:
The payroll tax expense includes various expense like - Social security tax payable, medicare tax payable, unemployment tax payable, etc.
So, we consider these items only.
The journal entry is shown below:
Payroll expense A/c Dr XXXXX
To Social security taxes payable A/c XXXXX
To Medicare taxes payable A/c XXXXX
(Being payroll expense is recorded)
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
Answer:
a. Determine the specific questions to be used for the two types of ratings: (1) How does our company rate on a number of attributes? (2) How important is each of these attributes?
Explanation:
Perceptual map may also be called as Market Mapping. It is a diagrammatic technique that is used by the asset marketers which attempts to visually display the perceptions of the customers or the potential customers. Positioning of the brand is influenced by the customer perceptions rather than those of any businesses.
In the context, Gary in order to form a perpetual map for the positioning, he should first determine some specific questions for the two types of the ratings -- how his company rate on the number of the attributes and the importance of these attributes.
Hence, option (a) is correct.
Answer:
The total economic cost is $40,500 per year
Explanation:
The total economic cost per year is equal to the sum of:
* The opportunity cost relating to sacrificing the current work Greg is working on which is equal to his yearly salary of : $40,00.
* The opportunity cost relating to sacrificing the interest income earned on $10,000 saving, which he is now used for purchasing equipment, which is calculated as: 10,000 * current rate of savings = 10,000* 5% = $500 ( total cost of equipment is not included because e could sell the equipment for what he paid later on).
=> So, total economic cost per year is $40,000 + $500 = $40,500.
Answer:
(1) To gain dominance in the Autonomous driving Technology.
(2) To utilize the vast network of drivers of Lyft to enhance the use of its technology
(3) To strategically place itself to compete favourably with other Autonomous driving Technology firms.
(4) To enhance its performance and profitability.
PART B
Lyft has a better transparent and user friendly application generally people trust their app in terms of pricing and trip duration.
LYFT HAS A BETTER REPUTATION THAN UBER WHICH HAS BEEN INVOLVED IN SERIES OF SCAMS IN 2017.
Explanation:
Waymo is a sister company to Google owned by alphabet inc., It is an autonomous driving Technology company with a state of the art Technology in the self driving cars.
Lyft is an American company which is involved in car lift,car hailing, car sharing etc services in major cities of the United States of America, it has developed a vast network of drivers and routes through out the United States.
The alliance between Waymo and Lyft was mainly to help both entities leverage on the competence of each party for the greater good of Both Companies.
