Deborah Samson and Lydia Darragh
<em>North.</em>
Explanation:
During this time, the North had focused on industrialization and had many factories. This was very different from the South and even the West, as they were still focused on agricultural advances. The North did not have a good enough climate and soil for agriculture, but with the creation of cities and the abundance of people, industrialization wasn't much of a problem.
If the federal government had offered Western lands at a low cost, some of the labor force working in the factories in the North may take them up on that offer. Many people did want to have a quiet, simple, farming life and with the low cost of land out West, many people wanted to take the offer. The North wasn't happy about this, as they needed workers to earn income.
We need a picture! We have no context! Maybe give us the list?
The Cold War in Latin America had marked consequences for the region's political and economic evolution. From the origins of US fears of Latin American Communism in the early 20th century to the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, regional actors played central roles in the drama. Africa, like all continents, was affected by the Cold War. It was probably less strategically important than Europe and Asia, though. ... Most of Africa had been divided into colonies until after World War II. Western European nations, exhausted by WWII, were no longer able to maintain control of their colonies in Africa.
And in Asia it was violent and brutal, which most of it was documented, but Mohandas Gandhi mostly led peaceful movements :)
Hope this helps, brainliest? :))