1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jeka94
3 years ago
12

Keisha is working on a math worksheet with 50 problems. She has completed 20 problems in 25 minutes. If she continues at the sam

e pace, what will the total time be for her to complete the worksheet?
A) 31.25 minutes
B) 62.5 minutes
C) 70 minutes
D) 75 minutes
History
2 answers:
Vesnalui [34]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

B

Explanation:

solution: 62.5 minutes

Solve using the proportion:  

20 /25  =  50 /x

lidiya [134]3 years ago
3 0
Work out the time it would take her to complete one problem (time taken ÷ problems done) and then multiply that answer by the total number of problems to work out the total time.

So that would be:
25 minutes ÷ 20 problems = 1.25 problems per minute
1.25 problems per minute × 50 problems total = 62.5 minutes total.

The answer is: B) 62.5 minutes.


You might be interested in
What were some of the problems faced by farmers in the period between 1877 and 1898?
Ivenika [448]

Answer:

Agricultural Problems and Gilded Age Politics. And Some Protest Movements.

Explanation:

Farmers no longer controlled the social, economic, or political systems and this was a bitter pill to swallow. II. The Unresponsiveness of the Republican and Democratic Parties to Agrarian Needs. During the Gilded Age from 1877-1896, political competition between the two major parties was incredibly intense and close.

And, After the American Civil War (1861–1865) agricultural prices began a long decline that lasted for a generation. Between 1870 and 1897 wheat fell from $106 per bushel to $63; corn fell from $43 to $29; and cotton fell from 15 cents a pound to five cents. At the same time farmers' costs of operation remained constant or increased. These costs included freight rates, interest on loans, and the cost of machinery and other needed commodities.

The cause of the farmers' troubles was overproduction occasioned by the expansion of the agricultural domain—it doubled during the same period—coupled with more efficient methods. Increased production overseas also contributed. However, U.S. farmers did not recognize the complexities of the matter. They believed they were the victims of a conspiracy generated by the railroad companies, the bankers, the grain elevator operators, and conservative politicians who favored a money system based on the gold standard. The latter was an outgrowth of the specie theory of money which held that precious metals must stand behind the circulating medium (money) to give it value. This system tended to keep money scarce and prices low. The farmers and their political leaders, on the other hand, adhered to the quantity theory of money which held that the amount of currency in circulation should be flexible (based on production) in order to meet the needs of all producers and debtors as well as creditors. A system based on this theory would tend to enlarge the money supply and make credit more easily available. It would also tend to drive prices up.

Therefore, The main problems American farmers faced in the 1890s included the steady decline of prices due to foreign competition and domestic overproduction, and the high rates charged by railroads and grain elevator operators to transport and store grains.

8 0
2 years ago
A historical source can be deemed unreliable if the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint. In this cas
AleksandrR [38]

A historical source is <u>biased</u> when it can be deemed unreliable because the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint.

<h3>What is bias?</h3>

Bias refers to a historian's perspective being strongly for or against an issue.

Historical bias refers to when the information in the source can be clearly described as <u>unfair, unbalanced, or prejudiced</u>.

Thus, a historical source is <u>biased</u> when it can be deemed unreliable because the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint.

Learn more about a biased historical source at brainly.com/question/1614300

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
This philosophy entered into the government of the Han Dynasty, prompting the
Blizzard [7]
Confuciousim is a theory
8 0
3 years ago
What type of foreign policy did the United state pursue after its victory in ww I
Harrizon [31]
The nation returned to isolationism
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
US war bonds helped the war effort by
Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

A raising money for the war effort

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many justices were on the Supreme Court initially?
    10·2 answers
  • The Four Freedoms:
    11·1 answer
  • 3. What are some important and controversial issues missing from this resolution? Why do you
    6·1 answer
  • Why is 9/11 important to history
    8·2 answers
  • What was the worst blood bath war that America has ever fought?
    5·2 answers
  • What happened as a result of the Creek War?
    14·2 answers
  • The fire alarm woke me.
    13·2 answers
  • How does the case of Escobedo vs Illinois get to the Supreme Court
    7·1 answer
  • Describe “Art Nouveau” in 5 adjectives.
    15·1 answer
  • Your topic is to research the achievements of African American leaders during the 1800s.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!