C. Copperheads.............
Answer:
inductive reasoning
Explanation:
There are essentially two different kinds of reasoning when it comes to new ideas:
- Inductive reasoning: This reasoning focuses in particular observations that will lead to generalizations.
- Deductive reasoning: This reasoning is the opposite of the first one and it focuses in generalizations and ideas which will be tested in particular observations.
Therefore, in inductive reasoning, empirical observations lead to new ideas.
I believe the answer is Cogent.
To be considered as cogent, an argument must be based on true premise and backed with relevant and accurate data.
On top of that, the argument must be framed in such a way that make it believable in the perspective of the listener.<span />
The critical theory in communication analyzes the social relations of communication such as the structural forms of disrespect they generate.
<h3>What is a critical theory?</h3>
This theory refers to the uses of knowledge gained through an interpretation for understanding the meaning of texts and symbols.
In communication, the theory does analyzes the social relations of communication such as the structural forms of disrespect they generate.
In conclusion, the theory also explains the damage & distortion of social relations of recognition.
Read more about critical theory
<em>brainly.com/question/16983427</em>
#SPJ11
The answer to this statement is yes. It is because a person with limited mental capacity should be granted of arbitration clause by the next of kin who signed of the behalf of the person because of the fact that the individual is mentally disabled.
