1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IgorLugansk [536]
4 years ago
7

Question of ethics agreement to arbitrate should a person with limited mental capacity be held to the arbitration clause agreed

to by the next-of-kin who signed on behalf of that person? why or why not?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Olenka [21]4 years ago
5 0
The answer to this statement is yes. It is because a person with limited mental capacity should be granted of arbitration clause by the next of kin who signed of the behalf of the person because of the fact that the individual is mentally disabled.
You might be interested in
What cind of Types of economies
Katarina [22]

<u><em>There are 2 types of economies,</em></u>

<u><em>---> Formal economies ( Eg: Capitalism, Socialism etc)</em></u>

<u><em>----> Informal economies ( Eg : Underground Economy)</em></u>

5 0
3 years ago
A planning committee has decided to determine the zoning of a particular area based on data provided by the town engineer. Which
const2013 [10]

The answer is<u><em> "c. Truth-wins scheme".</em></u>


In concentrate the manners in which that groups join individual opinions to achieve a cooperative choice, psychologists have recognized a couple of regular techniques called social choice plans. Group decisions are a piece of our lives.  

The group decision which was made dependent on new data and research. We call this the truth-wins scheme of social decision-making.

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is commonly found at the end of a book?
sdas [7]

Answer:

c. search engines

Explanation:

also some books have glossary

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Supporters of the plural executive structure make which argument in favor of it?
defon

Supporters of the plural executive structure rely on two main arguments in favor of it, which are protection against abuses of power by elected officials and also the position that this arrangement is more democratic.

The plural executive structure corresponds to the power distributed to more than one official elected by the citizens as head of state.

Therefore, the argument of the defenders of this arrangement is in respect of increased cooperation and trust between the executive and legislative powers, limitation of power and increased responsibility towards the population.

Learn more here:

brainly.com/question/5039460

8 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST ANSWER!!!!!!!!!!
ElenaW [278]
A for sure


Hope it helps
If you have any other questions feel free to ask them
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which were religious forces in Asia?
    15·2 answers
  • How is power distributed in a dictatorship
    11·2 answers
  • When a legislative body declares, prescribes, or commands something that is a specific law, it is known as
    5·1 answer
  • Which decision sets a legal precedent that if pollution control is more expensive than the damage pollution causes, the pollutio
    15·1 answer
  • Max Weber identified the ______, a belief in hard work, frugality, and good work as means to achieve both economic success and h
    14·1 answer
  • The researcher’s failure to protect research subjects from deductive disclosure is the primary ethical violation in which of the
    8·2 answers
  • A pattern of being late for work or for appointments is usually
    7·2 answers
  • The theme of the mystery of the missing mile high cake
    13·1 answer
  • Who supported dissenters
    8·2 answers
  • what percentage of families consisted of a married couple with a male breadwinner, a stay-at-home mom, and their children as of
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!