1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Damm [24]
3 years ago
11

Prior to the write off of a $500 customer account, Athena Company had the following account balances: Accounts receivable $19,60

0 Allowance for doubtful accounts 1,000 The net realizable value of the Accounts Receivable before and after the write-off was:
Business
1 answer:
Effectus [21]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Net accounts receivable Before $18,600 and  After $18,600

Explanation:

solution

we know that here

net accounts receivable before write-off  

Accounts Receivable = $19,600  

and Allowance for doubtful debt = $1,000

so Net accounts receivable =  $19,600 - $1,000 =  $18,600

so

Journal Entry for write off is here    

Allowance for doubtful Accounts = $500

Accounts Receivable = $500

and

Net accounts receivable after write off is    

Accounts Receivable= $19,100

and

Allowance for doubtful debt= $500  

so Net accounts receivable = $19,100 - $500

Net accounts receivable = 8,600

so Net accounts receivable Before $18,600 and  After $18,600

You might be interested in
Suppose that Steve, one of the partners in a home improvement company, intends to dissolve the partnership. Before he can give n
bija089 [108]

Answer:

still be liable for Hala's contract.

Explanation:

Any contract entered into by any of the partners, before the dissolution of a partnership business is deemed legal hence binding on the partners. This means that the partners will still be liable for the new contract in line with their partnership status.

Although, before a partnership business can be dissolved, at least one of partners must give a notice of intent. If in the process of giving the notice, another member enters in a new contract, such will be valid and partners will still be held liable because the business has still not been dissolved in the eye of the law.

Any contract entered into by any partner in a partnership business aftet dissution becomes illegal hence not binding on other members.

6 0
3 years ago
Lakers Company produces two products. The following information is available: Product X Product Y Selling price per unit $46 $36
never [62]

Answer:

A) Contribution margin : Product X: $8; Product Y: $12

B)The expected net income: $18,000

C) Break-even point in units for each product is Product X 19,500 units, Product Y 6,500 units.

D) Break-even point in units for each product is Product X 14,625 units, Product Y 9,750 units.

Explanation:

A) Contribution margin for each product:

Product X = Selling price of X - Variable cost of X = 46 - 38 = $8

Product Y = Selling price of Y - Variable cost of Y = 36 - 24 = $12

B) The expected net income:

Expected net income = Contribution margin of product X x Units of Product X sold + Contribution margin of product Y x Units of Product Y sold  - Fixed cost = 8 x 21,000 + 12 x 7,000 - 234,000 = $18,000

C) The break-even point in units for each product assuming the sales mix is 3 units of Product X for every 1 unit of Product Y:

Denote a is the number of Y BEP (in units) => 3a is the number of X in BEP (in units)

We have 3a x 8 + a x 12 = 234,000 <=> 36a = 234,000 <=> a = $6,500 <=> 3a = 19,500

Thus,  break-even point in units for each product is Product X 19,500 units, Product Y 6,500 units.

D) The break-even point in units for each product assuming the sales mix is 3 units of Product X for every 2 units of Product Y:

Denote b is the number of Y BEP (in units) => 3b/2 is the number of X in BEP (in units)

We have 3b/2 x 8 + b x 12 = 234,000 <=> 24b = 234,000 <=> b = $9,750 <=> 3b/2 = 14,625

Thus,  break-even point in units for each product is Product X 14,625 units, Product Y 9,750 units.

3 0
3 years ago
International trade has always played a role in the U.S. economy. Is this role increasing or decreasing (in terms of exports and
Arturiano [62]

Answer: Option (F)

Explanation:

International trade tends to allow nations to expand their respective markets for commodities, goods and services which otherwise wouldn't have been available. As the outcome of the international trade, market tends to contain the greater competition, thus indirectly tends to have competitive prices, that further brings cheaper commodities home to consumer.

The vital point under this scenario is that within the past decade due to technological transformation the cost of communication has decreased drastically and thus has always impacted International trade.

8 0
3 years ago
The stock of business adventures sells for $40 a share. Its likely dividend payout and end-of-year price depend on the state of
Sholpan [36]

Answer:

Explanation:

(a) HPR = Ending Price - Beginning Price + Cash Dividend / Beginning Price

a. The holding period returns for the three scenarios are:

Boom: (48 - 40 + 2.8)/40 = 0.27 = 27%

Normal: (43 - 40 + 1.8)/40 = 0.120 = 12.0%

Recession: (34 - 40 + .90)/40 = -0.1275 = -12.75%

= [(1/3) × 0.27] + [(1/3) × 0.120] + [(1/3) × (-0.1275) =0.08750 or 9%

Variance = [(1/3) × (0.27 - 0.08750)^2] + [(1/3) × (0.120 - 0.08750)^2] + [(1/3) × (-0.1275 - 0.08750)^2] = .026863

Std. Dev = Sq. Rt .026863 = .16390 = 16.39%

(b) E(r) = (0.5 × 8.75%) + (0.5 × 5%) = 6.88%

σ = 0.5 × 16.39% = 8.19%

Thanks

3 0
3 years ago
Explain why a rational consumer who had diminishing marginal utility for a good would not consume an additional unit when it gen
astra-53 [7]

Answer:

The answer is: Negative marginal utility means that at some point you will be worst off if you keep consuming extra units of a product. That means that you will stop consuming that product to stop getting worse even if that product is given to you for free.

Explanation:

The law of diminishing marginal utility states that as someone consumes a product, the satisfaction that they get from the product wanes out as they consume more and more of that product. Eventually they wouldn´t get any more satisfaction from consuming that product, they may even get worse if they consume more of that product (negative marginal utility). At that point they will stop consuming it. They will either change to some other substitute product or not consume at all.  

A great example for this is an all you can eat buffet. A person eats until they are full. They may eat a lot, but eventually they will stop eating even if the extra food is "free" or already paid for.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The value of what you owe minus what you owe is called
    14·1 answer
  • In PowerPoint, where do you enter data for a chart?
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following are microeconomic problems? (You may select more than one answer.)(a) Work/leisure choice.(b) Marketing s
    10·1 answer
  • Suppose you just won the state lottery, and you have a choice between receiving $2,575,000 today or a 20-year annuity of $250,00
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a disadvantage of a decentralized organizational structure? A. Increasing the size of the corporate bu
    13·1 answer
  • A Whopper combo meal costs $3.00 and gives you an additional 15 units of utility; a meal at the Embassy Suites costs $29.00 and
    12·1 answer
  • Imagine that a country produces only three goods: apples, bananas, and carrots. The quantities produced and the prices of the th
    8·1 answer
  • The most common definition that monetary policymakers use for price stability is
    10·1 answer
  • If a firm’s expenses equal or exceed its revenue, what actions might management take?
    9·1 answer
  • Bob cratchit needs $16 per month for grave maintenance after he passes. if he earns 3.0 nnual interest, compounded monthly, how
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!