Answer: Tragedy of the commons
Explanation: Tragedy of the commons could simply be explained as the potential destruction or abuse of a communal resource which belongs to not one but group of people or a community due to unrestricted or unregulated access afforded to all members. The destruction or damage done is usually due to the self interest of members who are only guided by their own personal pursuit giving little or no regard to shared instruments, products, infrastructures or resources. In other to guard against 'tragedy of the commons' regulations and restrictions should be made to shield or protect shared resources.
Answer: No, the salesperson is not telling you the truth.
Explanation:
Reasons are;
1) The exact number of pictures a phone of (X) memory cannot be determined due to the fact that pictures have carrying qualities and consequently would occupy varrying amount of space.
2) 10,000 pictures may or may not be stored in a 8gb memory phone, only an estimate can be given as the phone camera does not have the capacity to compress pictures to exact file sizes.
Answer: Across subjects multiple-baseline design
Explanation: The single case design involves experiment whereby only one group is used as to make inference in the study, the control group and treatment group aren't distinct. When behavior is measured or observed in two or more participants belonging to a single group by delivering a the same intervention or treatment at different poinf in time. In the scenario above, the smile and eye contact is the treatment being delivered or used on the participants to measure the the level of responsiveness of the participants. After trying the treatment on the first subject, the treatment was so test on the other participants, hence
Answer:
D. Judicial Activism
Explanation:
Judicial Activism is the judicial philosophy that argues the Court should go beyond the words of the Constitution or a statue to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions.
It is the opposite of Judicial Restraint, as a judicial philosophy theory, which limits the power of judges to act only as per existing legal provisions under constitution.
