I think the answer is false
:):):):):):):)
Answer:
Khi một lượng sản lượng cụ thể được sản xuất, một lượng thu nhập giống hệt nhau được tạo ra bởi vì sản lượng đó thuộc về một người nào đó. Do đó, chúng ta có nhận dạng rằng đầu ra bằng thu nhập (trong đó danh tính là một phương trình luôn đúng bất kể giá trị của bất kỳ biến nào).
Explanation:
When a particular quantity of output is produced, an identical quantity of income is generated because the output belongs to someone. Thus we have the identity that output equals income (where an identity is an equation that is always true regardless of the values of any variables).
There are ways to control different situations. The dimensions of situational control Fiedler's contingency theory are leader-member relations, task structure, and position power.
Fiedler's is popularly known for his contingency theory. This theory helps to understand why managers can behave so differently.
The contingency theory states that there no one single leadership style often works for all employees.
He stated also that there are situational-contingent elements that influences a leader's ability to lead.
Learn more about Fiedler's contingency theory from
brainly.com/question/14615424
Answer:
It will take 10.058 years from today.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Present value= $1,091
Future value= $1,728
Interest rate= 12%
<u>First, we need to calculate the number of years it will take to transform the PV into the FV:</u>
<u></u>
n= ln(FV/PV) / ln(1+i)
n= ln(1,728/1,091) / ln(1.12)
n= 4.058 years
It will take 10.058 years from today.
Answer:
Your opportunity cost of attending a game compared with the opportunity cost facing a college student 10 years ago is:
A) higher, because more games are televised today.
Opportunity costs are the cost of choosing one alternative from another.
In this case, when college students attend college football games they are unable to do other activities, not only while they are at the stadium or going to the stadium, but they are not able to purchase other goods. The cost of those alternatives that are lost are higher now because many college football games are televised now, before if you wanted to see a game you had to go to the game. So a student is now able to watch the game while doing other activities, or saving money for buying something else.
Can this change in opportunity cost account for the decline in college football attendance?
B) Yes, because these changes increase the opportunity cost of watching football games in person.
Even though opportunity costs do not involve actual cash payments, they are still important and individuals do consider them when they are choose one option over another. E.g. imagine if you had to choose between spending a considerable amount of money by attending a game (ticket, gas, beverages, etc.) or watching that game on TV and buying a few clothes instead or going on a date, etc. What option would you choose?
