In order to answer this question, I will use two different perspectives of ethics: the consequentialist perspective, and the deontological perspective.
Consequentialism argues that the morality of an action lies with its consequences. This means that an action with bad consequences is an immoral action, and vice versa. In this case, killing the last remaining Redwood would not have any negative consequence on any being in the world, as no one benefits from it anymore. This means that the act is not immoral.
A deontological perspective states that there are principles that should be taken as rules, and which govern what is right and what is wrong. Therefore, rules and duties are central. For example, a principle might state that "all life is valuable." As the Redwood falls under the definition of life, killing it would be considered an immoral action.
The pyramids were built by some 20,000 to 30,000 workers and it was built for Pharaoh Khufu. there are many different thoughts as to who specifically built them and who made the project happen.
Answer:
one major difference between state and federal courts in the United States, only state courts use an adversarial system during trials, only state courts issue verdicts in both criminal and civil cases, only federal courts allow defendants to appeal rulings, only federal courts must have judges
