The War of 1812 has been called the “Second

2 answers:

7 0

The War of 1812 has been called the “Second War for American Independence” primarily because the 3) British government had never fully respected the United States as a free nation.

3241004551 [841]3 years ago

3 0

The War of 1812 has been called the “Second War for American Independence” primarily because of the
3) The British government had never fully respected the United States as a free nation

Explanation:
The War of 1812 was a serious turning purpose in American history therein it emotional America from Jefferson's political orientation, moreover as any signs of political theory, and towards full general democracy. The Britishers never accepted and revered the united nations and never thought about them as a free nation.

You might be interested in

In the Boxer Rebellion, who were

Alex787 [66]

The Answer is B Anti-foreign forces who won control of the Chinese government persuaded the Boxers to end their fight against the dynasty and join them to destroy foreigners.

5 0

2 years ago

When Franklin fell ill with polio, Eleanor handled it well. She helped him to fight hard to continue in his political career.

Aleonysh [2.5K]

Yes, this does sound true indeed.

5 0

2 years ago

Hypothesizing in his Farewell Address, Washington

IrinaK [193]

Answer: "It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign world": it was George Washington's Farewell Address to us. The inaugural pledge of Thomas Jefferson was no less clear: "Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations-entangling alliances with none."

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Plz my English teacher asked for this because my classmate said it.

Liono4ka [1.6K]

1 . The meaning of boo is to suddenly surprise someone.
Or , to show dissatisfaction and disapproval.
Also, a slang you could call your lover.
2. A boo could mean boyfriend or girlfriend .
3. Anyone calls anyone boo I guess .

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

He second part of the declaration of independence best exemplifies the __________. division of powers separation of powers natur

Kobotan [32]

Answer: Social contract theory

By "the second part," I presume you mean the list of grievances against the British government, which followed the first section (in which natural rights were a strong emphasis).

After asserting natural rights in the opening section, saying that "all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness," then the Declaration of Independence goes on to give a list of "facts to be submitted to a candid world." These facts were meant to demonstrate that the British king had been seeking to establish "an absolute Tyranny over these States" (the colonial states which were declaring their independence). This was a violation of the social contract which exists between a government and those governed.

The list of grievances against the British government included items such as:

The king refused to assent to laws that were wholesome and necessary for the public good.
The king had forbidden colonial governors to enact laws or implement laws without his assent (which, as the prior point noted, he was in no hurry to give).
The king forced people to give up their rights to legislative assembly or forced legislative bodies to meet in difficult places that imposed hardships on them.
The king dissolved legislative assemblies and then refused for a long time to have other assemblies elected.
The king obstructed justice in the colonies and made judges dependent on his will alone for their salaries and their tenure in office.
The king kept standing armies in place in the colonies in peacetime, without the consent of the colonial legislatures.
The king imposed taxes without the colonists' consent.

These and additional items listed in the Declaration were meant to support the colonies' position that tyranny was standard operating procedure by the British monarchy, and therefore revolution was justified. This was based on the idea of the social contract, that a government's authority to govern came from the people, and if the government did not serve the people properly, it could be replaced. The Declaration asserted that principle in these words: "When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them [the people] under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

4 0

3 years ago