According to Article VII, the Constitution would go into effect when nine states ratified it. A fierce debate raged for months b
etween the Federalists, who supported the Constitution, and the Anti-Federalists, who opposed it. What arguments did each group present? Fill in the chart below with a brief description of the main arguments.
1) Federalists: -- Felt that the Constitution was necessary, as it gave the federal government more power than the Articles of Confederation. --Having a weak federal government was a bad idea, as this concept did not work well when the Articles of Confederation were implemented. -- Having no executive branch (president) made it difficult to develop a clear sense of direction for the nation. Using the new constitution would fix this problem.
2) Anti-Federalist: -- Believed that the federal government had too much power. -- Anti-federalists believed that a strong federal government could result in corruption. --Anti-federalists also feared the federal government would not consider the needs/wants of the citizens, as this is what the British government did right before America declared their independence.
Biological warfare was effective against the Inca because there immune system's were not used to that type of diseases that Europeans brought over. There are very susceptible to disease and were wiped out quickly