Answer: 4. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Explanation:
In June 1978, the Supreme Court declared that affirmative action was legal insofar as racial quotas were not used. The case was brought by a white California man, Allan Bakke who said he had suffered reverse racism as he had higher scores than minority group members but was refused admission because of a University rule that reserved 16% of admission slots for minority groups. The Supreme Court ordered the University to admit Bakkie as using quotas was unconstitutional but also held that race can be used as a valid factor in admissions decisions.
This showed that affirmative action was legal but subject to scrutiny.
Answer:
Amazon
Explanation:
You can look on amazon and im 99.9% sure that they will have it, good luck :)
Answer:
Answer is adequacy [ nutritional adequacy]
Explanation:
Adequate or sufficient consumption of essential nutrients which is required in fulfilling nutritional requirements is known to be adequacy [ nutritional ].
The mean adequacy ratio [MAR] can be calculated as follows
MAR = sum of NAR/ number of nutrients × 100.
Note; NAR is Nutrients adequacy ratio.
Answer:
The answer is postmodernism.
Explanation:
Postmodernism was a reaction to the ideas of <u>modernism</u>. Postmodernist thinkers believed knowledge, values, morality, reason and other aspects of philosophy were socially constructed. For this reason, postmodernist thought usually engaged in irony and self-reference.
The movement was also an inspiration for modern art pieces and literature, which involved the same skeptic and deconstructive approach.
