Answer:
Yes its true that both companies are strategic allies.
Explanation:
In strategic alliance, two companies work together to achieve their combined objectives. For example if we talk about Sony Ericson K510i cellphone, it was one of best selling cell phones at its time because two companies Sony and Ericson worked together to increase their sales and earn profit. One of these had display and camera capabilities and the other had cellphone designs, etc. These were the things that made the product differentiated from the rest of the cellphones and we see that both companies earned a lot from it.
Answer:
monopolist
Explanation:
Monopolistic competition is a kind of imperfect competition in which specific person or enterprise is the only supplier of a particular commodity.
A monopolist is not very much concerned about the product as customers have no alternatives but to buy that product.
Also, he can change the price or quantity of the product as in an industry he is a single seller .
In the given question, it's given that There is often only one provider of cable television services in each region of the country: Time Warner is in New York, Comcast is in most of New England, and so forth.
So, it would have caused Comcast to become an overly large <u>monopolist</u> with too much power if it buys Time Warner.
Answer:
The correct answer is C) A variable ratio reinforcement schedule
.
Explanation:
In this case, Neil must use an effort program of variable reason, considering that if he wants to create an operant behavior in a subject, he can administer the reinforcing stimulus only when the subject performs a certain number of times the behavior in question, for example every three times ; In this case, there is a fixed ratio reinforcement program. If instead you prefer to administer the booster when the subject performs a variable number of behaviors (for example, sometimes every three behaviors, sometimes every two, sometimes every four), you will have a variable ratio booster program.
Answer:
I think Sean should negotiate for 2,500 dollars and save the 500 dollars for college or for something else he might want or need to buy.
Answer:
The transformational leaders are bureaucratic and charismatic are people oriented in nature.
Explanation:
- The charismatic leaders are also called as the transformational leaders and shares various things.
- Charismatic leaders make their status better and transformational leaders focus on the transformation of the organization's vision. The main difference is the focus and the audience.
- The charismatic leaders are committed and have engaging personalities like martin Luther king as his speeches were often more tangible than other leaders and used to have a huge influence on the people he met.
- The charismatic leaders are more emotionally attached to their audience. They work towards an emphasis on the greater good. More people-oriented.
