It is what is right for the individual. A moral relativist is a person who believes that their claims are not universal and can change from event to event.
The fallacies of misdirected and emotional appeals bad arguments becausemisdirected appeals are arguments that “appeals to a questionable authority”. Fallacies of misdirected appeals are bad arguments because the statement is misdirecting the reader by the use of a questionable person of authority in a different subject matter that is not in their field of expertise, thus providing non-supporting evidence for the conclusion
.An emotional appeal is an “argument that appeals to fear”. Fallacies of emotional appeals are bad arguments because they are based on emotions rather than on valid or supporting evidence.
Emotional appeals are used to create a sense of fear into the audience, thus the reactions of the audience are based on their emotions and uncertainties rather than supporting evidence to formulate an educated and unbiased opinion or conclusion
Learn more about argument here:brainly.com/question/3775579
#SPJ4
Answer:
i think you can answer that bruhhh....
Explanation:
You're fluent in tagalog right???
just think deeper and you know the answer.. :)
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Utilitarianism is a philosophical theory that seeks to understand the foundations of ethics and morals from the consequences of actions.
In this case, utilitarianism is the idea that an action can only be considered morally correct if its consequences promote collective well-being. If the outcome of the action is negative for most, it is classified as morally reprehensible. That is, according to utilitarianism, rules should not be taken on the basis of the greatest utility, but should be established on the basis of the social welfare that these rules will provide to society.
From this reasoning, utilitarianism presents itself as opposed to selfishness, since the consequences of actions must be focused on the happiness of a set and not on particular and individual interests.
