Han applies option c- he is challenging the credibility of sources. Ramona ,surprised, asks him if the evidence from Pettit's book was from fictional sources. Hans supports his claim through a review of Giovanni Fiorini's book. The material from this book which had been written by a story-teller and not by a historian was used by Pettit.
Option a- is wrong. Hans is not determining new research goals. He is questioning the credibility of sources.
Option b-is wrong. Hans is evaluating what an author said about Giovanni Fiorini's book. The material from this 'great' source was used by Pettit in <em>his </em>book.
Option d is wrong. Ramona is asking clarifying questions. She wants Hans to justify his claim. This states that the credibility of sources can be questioned.
An interpretation is an <em>opinion or explanation</em> of the meaning of something. An Aesthetic interpretation is an explanation of the meaning of a work of art. When (A) A photograph is transformed into a painting; (B) A television show starts a new season and (D) A book is adapted into a movie, all have the same purpose, to show and <em>present the original in a </em><em>new and different way</em>. But a painting that was reproduced in form of a puzzle is still the same painting that was just cut into small pieces.
<em>Answer: C</em>
A serpent and an elephant. It was a town of machinery and tall chimneys, out of which interminable [unending] serpents of smoke trailed themselves for ever and ever, and never got uncoiled. It had a black canal in it, and a river that ran purple with ill-smelling dye, and vast piles of building full of windows where there was a rattling and a trembling all day long, and where the piston of the steam-engine worked monotonously up and down, like the head of an elephant in a state of melancholy madness.
It would be “girl” and “class”
