Foreign policy is the

History

2 answers:

Ivanshal [37]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Foreign policy is the set of political objectives that a particular state aims to achieve in its relations with other countries in the world.

Foreign policy is often designed to protect a country's national interests, especially its national security, economic prosperity, and values. Achievement of such objectives can be achieved by peaceful (international cooperation) or violent (aggression, war, exploitation) means. It should be remembered that international law, through the UN Charter, prohibits aggression.

Semenov [28]3 years ago

3 0

Foreign Policy is an American news publication, founded in 1970 and focused on global affairs, current events, and domestic and international policy.

Hope I helped

Have a great day

You might be interested in

What best defines compromise?

tino4ka555 [31]

The answer should be "C.Missouri was admitted as a slave state; Maine as a free state". Hope this helps. (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*:･ﾟ✧

8 0

3 years ago

The book of life what was the bet between la muerte and xibalba?

Amiraneli [1.4K]

<span>The bet between La Muerte and Xibalba is who will get the chance to marry Maria.</span>

3 0

4 years ago

What was the first major allied victory in which the US was involved

Minchanka [31]

Answer: Guadalcanal campaign

Explanation:

The universe War ii skirmish of guadalcanal might have been the Initially significant hostile Also an unequivocal triumph to those partners in the pacific theater. For japanese troops stationed in this segment of the solomon Islands, what's to come for U. Encountered with urban decay because of deindustrialization, engineering imagined, government lodgin. Marines started An amazement assault for admirable 1942 Furthermore took control of a air base under development.

5 0

3 years ago

ILL MARK BRAINLY!!!!!!!!!!!Infer: If Columbus and all European explorers had been kind, and helpful, and never deliberately harm

Tresset [83]

Answer:

A) The natives would have been wiped out by smallpox and other European diseases anyway, since they had no immunity

Explanation:

Even if the Europeans were not cruel and aggressive toward the native populations of the Americas, the end result wouldn't have been much different. The reason for this is that the majority of the deaths of the Native Americans came from the European diseases, as their immune system was not able to cope with them. Yes, there were lot of deaths caused by wars, torture, and forced labor, but compared to the deaths caused by diseases they comprise a very small percentage. The Europeans didn't wanted to wipe out the native populations at all, as their plan was to use them as labor force on their plantations, but that didn't came to be, as the diseases they brought with them had an effect similar to the one of the plague in Europe.

7 0

3 years ago

How did each candidate view the issue of slavery?

Alex Ar [27]

Answer:The 1860 presidential election turned on a number of issues including secession; the relationship between the federal government, states, and territories; and ...

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago