Answer:
value creation; value capture
Explanation:
Curry is analysing value creation. Value creation can be defined as the existing difference that exist in the buyer's value of a customer and the cost of a firm in rendering a service or in giving a product.
Cassie on the other hand is analysing value capture. Value capture is a situation whereby a firm accrues profit by charging a price that exceeds the cost they got for a product or for rendering service
Example of Indonesian Sundanese meal; ikan bakar (roasted fish), nasi timbel (rice wrapped in banana leaf), ayam goreng (fried chicken), sambal, fried tempeh and tofu, and sayur asem; the bowl of water with lime is kobokan.
Based on the previous works, Durkheim felt that creating a society without crime would be <u>impossible</u>.
<h3>Emile Durkheim</h3>
Emile Durkheim is a famous French sociologist who was generally considered as one of the fathers of modern social science alongside the likes of Karl Max and Max Weber.
In one of his submissions, he concluded that it is <u>impossible</u> to create a society without crime.
According to him, some minor crimes are essential and valuable to society. Otherwise, society could not exist without it.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>Impossible</u>."
Learn more about Durkheim here: brainly.com/question/8837353
Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
