The persuasive effect of the statement was to engages the audience and call for a response.
<h3>Why did the enemy left the New England provinces?</h3>
The action of the enemy was meant to enrage the common colonist, that is, the Britain is enlisting Americans in their army and attacking in America's most vulnerable region.
However, the sentence has a persuasive effect which was to engages the audience and call for a response from the reader.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about New England provinces
<em>brainly.com/question/5017297</em>
#SPJ1
Answer:
(2) Bustling.
Explanation:
Colm Toibin's novel "Brooklyn" is about the story of a young woman stuck in between her life in Brooklyn and her hometown in Ireland. The protagonist Eilis Lacey had been married secretly to Tony where she has a job in Brooklyn. But when she had to go to Ireland for the funeral of her sister Rose, she was led to stay longer and even had a brief relationship with a man named Jim. But when her secret marriage was on the verge of being revealed, she decided to tell her mother about Tony, left a letter for Jim and went back to Brooklyn.
The statement that is mentioned in the question<em> "And we are worked off our feet"</em> is from the part where Miss Kelly had called on Eilis to offer her a job in her shop as a bookkeeper. By this implication, Miss Kelly meant that her shop is busy and that they have a lot of customer.
Answer:
bad thing: u compare your self to other people, bad mental health, etc
Explanation:
good thing: u may actually learn interesting stuff, keep up with friends plus family, know when major events may occur
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Jury pools are drafted from voter registration lists, so if you're not legible to vote you cannot be drafted to serve on a jury.
Answer:
B). "He found that children and adults who have read stories their whole lives were more likely to correctly identify the feelings and thoughts of others than those who do not read regularly."
C). "Trying to understand these characters exercises the same mental muscle that helps us understand people in the real world."
Explanation:
The above two evidence factually support and substantiate the claim that 'people who read stories are better at communicating and understanding the feelings of others.'
The first evidence i.e. option B states that <u>the research revealed 'the children or adults who have been reading stories constantly their whole lives are able to recognize the thoughts or feelings of others more accurately' while the second evidence i.e. option C asserts logically that 'in attempt to understand the characters of stories, the same mental muscle is required for understanding people in real life.'</u>
Thus, these two pieces of evidence not only support but substantiates how reading comprehends our understanding of thoughts, opinions, or feelings of others. Hence, <u>options B and C</u> are the correct answers.
