The Progressive party managed to attract Democratic voters in the southern states <span>of the following was the key reason for Coolidge’s victory in the 1924 presidential election, but it wasn't key reason Coolidge was very popular due to his economic policies</span>
Perhaps the best one might be able to say for the Munich Pact and the policy of appeasement is that it aimed to "give peace a chance" (as the song lyric goes), and that maybe it delayed the start of an overall European war. But it does seem that the ambitions of Adolph Hitler and the Nazi party were making war an eventual inevitability for Europe in the 1930s.
The policy of appeasement was signed by the prime ministers of Britain and France with Hitler in Munich in September, 1938. They had given in to Germany's annexation of the Sudentland as a German territory, including the evacuation of any Czech population from the region. After signing the Munich Pact, Hitler took control of all of Czechoslovakia (in March, 1939). Britain and France still did not pursue war with Germany when that happened. But when Germany invaded Poland in September, 1939, it was beyond clear that appeasing Hitler hadn't worked, and war was pursued.
A. Hitler resented the restrictions it placed on Germany and wanted to restore the country’s power.
Answer:
Searching for sea root toward Asia
Explanation:
The European explorations were a direct result of the establishing of the Ottoman Empire. The Ottomans had their empire right on the most important place when it came to trade between Europe and Asia, so pretty much everything had to pass through their territory. They used this in order to get a lot of wealth, so they imposed big taxes. That was not seen fondly by the Europeans because they were dependent on the good will of someone else, and plus everything was becoming more expensive and less profitable. In order to find a new sea root toward Asia, they actually managed to discover two new continents by accident, North and South America, thus setting the beginnings of the colonialism.
No, I believe that multiple weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation would have hurt America in time. One of the biggest problems was the lack of detail and specific attributes that the Constitution brings from long discussion and debates over what is best for the country. America needed to strengthen it's central government if it wanted to get anywhere, so we may not have become so powerful if we left the majority of the power in the state's hands. Another lacking component was the fact that we had no Executive branch to enforce Congress' laws and no National court to determine the meaning of the laws. Another example is the making of one currency for the entire country. These examples and more could have hurt America if they wouldn't have written the Constitution.
