Answer:
Most States had their names derived from a simple Linguistic tradition of naming a place according to what the locals called it.
Explanation:
If we study the etymology of the names of US States, it becomes very clear that as Europeans started to take over local lands, they wanted to maintain the 'exotic factor' and uniqueness of the land and it's location tradition.
Even today, the names honor the long lost tribes and languages of North America.
For example, The State of IOWA is named after the local native American tribes of the Iwoas. KANSAS is named after the local tribe of Kaw, another native American tribe.
Some other names pay tribute to what others called their home. For example the Sioux tribe used to call their home Dakota, which means friends in their language. Today, the State is called Dakota.
Other States have even more interesting origins such as the State of Georgia which was named after King George of England.
Geothermal plateau. I'm only guessing, but since a lot of places use heat as energy it only makes sense.
Answer:
1. Three-Fifths Compromise.
2. The Great Compromise.
3. Origination Clause.
4. Electoral College.
Explanation:
1. Three-Fifths Compromise: representation of slaves in the South.
The Three-fifths Compromise was a compromise reached among delegates who came from the southern and northern states during the United States Constitutional Convention which held in 1787.
2. The Great Compromise: state representation in the legislature.
3. Origination Clause: introduction of revenue bills. This is contained in Article I, section 7, clause 1 of the constitution of the United States of America; stating that all revenue bills must originate from the House of Representatives.
4. Electoral College: concern over the presidential election. They are saddled with the responsibility of electing the president for the United States of America after the citizens cast their vote.
Answer:
After Reconstruction, discriminatory voting laws are passed that disenfranchise people based on race. The Supreme Court rules in Shelby v. Holder that criteria to determine which districts need federal oversight are no longer valid.
Explanation:
Hope this helped!
Answer:
The correct option is B, the profits of copper produces increase
Explanation:
Assuming copper is price inelastic, meaning the rise in price would not impact the quantity demanded significantly, the revenue of the suppliers increase and as a result the bottom-line( profits) recorded by the suppliers increase.
A price increase cannot bring about reduction in quantity supplied ads increase in price is an incentive to supply more, hence option A is wrong.
Option C is totally out of context as well as option D
The government is not the one producing the copper let alone increase the content of the copper
