Answer:
The protagonist handles the conflict quite poorly in the beginning of the story because he is so hungry and lose hope, this is stated "Hunger made our envy as dull and feeble as all our other feelings. We had no strength left for feelings, to search for easier work, to walk, to ask, to beg." but then gets the urge for freedom. Because the protagonist is in the gulag and his friend has found a map to escape and chooses to go with his friend, this is stated “I’m willing,” I said, opening my eyes. “Only I’ve got to feed myself up first.”. the outcome from the conflict is them trying to escape due to the poor conditions.
Explanation:
i got full credit for this answer, don't forget to change it up a bit.
Only Eliot is correctly capitalized. Football and game are not supposed to be capital :)
This is how a reader should analyze indirect characterization-
- describing the character by noticing how the character interacts with other characters.
- by noticing details about what the character says, does, and thinks.
- by noticing how the other characters perceive the character.
- by noticing statements the narrator makes about the character’s appearance.
<h3>What is
characterization?</h3>
Characterization is the portrayal of people (or other living things) in dramatic and literary works. Character development is occasionally used interchangeably. This portrayal may employ direct techniques, such as attributing qualities in commentary or description, as well as indirect (or "dramatic") techniques that ask readers to draw conclusions about individuals' traits based on their behavior, speech, or appearance. A character is a personage like that. Character is a component in literature. The 19th century saw the invention of the word "characterization."
To learn more about characterization with the help of given link:
brainly.com/question/1393329
#SPJ9
Authors might have something else in mind for what they are writing about.
His experience and beliefs are well portrayed by the young lawyer in "The Bet" when the lawyer decides to forfeit his prize given his changed beliefs. Like the lawyer in the story, Chekhov devoted his life to what he believed in instead of focusing on his financial status.
Ω
