All categories

3 years ago

I need help‼️‼️‼️‼️ please and thank you

Mathematics

2 answers:

evablogger [386]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

I feel like the answer would be 110 in.

Step-by-step explanation:

First what I did was I added both lengths together (7+3) and the heights together (2+9)

Then i multiplied those answers together to get 110

Svetlanka [38]3 years ago

3 0

Divide the rectangle in 2 so it'll be easier to find the area of each.

First rectangle: 9 * 4 or 36

Second rectangle: 2 * 3 or 6

Then add the areas to get the total: 36 + 6 = 42 (inches)

You might be interested in

A food distributor is being sued for racial discrimination because 12% of newly hired candidates are not white when 53% of all a

Musya8 [376]

Answer:

Check Explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

A) The null hypothesis would be that the proportion of newly hired candidates that are not white is not significantly different from the proportion of the applicants that are not white & there is no significant evidence that the company's hiring practices are discriminatory.

Mathematically,

H₀: μ₀ = 0.53

And the alternative hypothesis would be that there is a significant difference between the proportion of newly hired candidates that are not white is not significantly different from the proportion of the applicants that are not white. More specifically, that the proportion of newly hired candidates that are not white is significantly less than the proportion of applicants that are not white & there is significant evidence that the company's hiring practices are indeed discriminatory.

Mathematically,

Hₐ: μ₀ < 0.53

B) The two errors that can come up in this hypothesis testing include -

Type I error: We reject the null hypothesis because we obtain that the proportion of newly hired candidates that are not white is significantly less than the proportion of applicants that are not white and conclude that there is indeed significant evidence that the company's hiring practices are discriminatory when in reality, there is no significant difference and hence, no discrimination.

Type II error: We accept the null hypothesis (fail to reject the null hypothesis) because we obtained that there is no significant difference between the proportion of newly hired candidates that are not white & th proportion of applicants that are not white and conclude that there is no discrimination in the company's hiring practices when in reality, there is significant difference in the stated proportions above and significant evidence that there is indeed significant evidence that the company's hiring practices are discriminatory.

C) The power of the test increases as the significance level reduces. This is because t-statistic increases as significance level reduces.

D) The standard error of the mean used in computing the t-score is given as

σₓ = (σ/√n)

It is evident that as the value of n increases, the standard error reduces and this widens the effect of the test, hence, the power of the test increases.

Hope this Helps!!!

7 0

3 years ago

Please help!!! ill mark brainliest

Vesnalui [34]

3x - 1 = 3x + 1

subtract 3x from both sides to get (-1 = 1). This is a false statement so it is: CONTRADICTION

************************************************

4x - 11 = 7

add 11 to both sides and then divide both sides by 4 to get $(x = \frac{18}{4} = \frac{9}{2})$ . This statement is true only when x = $\frac{9}{2}$ so it is: CONDITIONAL

*************************************************

2 - 8x = 2 - 8x

add 8x to both sides to get (2 = 2). This is a true statement so it is: IDENTITY

*************************************************

x + 1 = -x + 4

add x to both sides, subtract 1 from both sides, and divide both sides by 2 to get $(x = \frac{3}{2} )$ . This statement is true only when x = $\frac{3}{2}$ so it is: CONDITIONAL

Answer: B, A, C, A

6 0

3 years ago

If f(x) = -4x^2 - 5x + 2, what is f(3) ?

svp [43]

The value should be -49. Hope this helps.

5 0

3 years ago

PLSSS HELP ME WITH MATH

labwork [276]

Step-by-step explanation:

always remember, equations and inequalities are like a scale with 2 pans (left and right).

a variable is like a placeholder, an empty spot on the pans. and the expressions on both sides are kind of the conditions for the things to put in these empty spots so that the status of the scale stays unchanged.

for an equation the scale has to stay balanced all the time.

and in an inequality one side is heavier that the other (it normally does not matter how much heavier) with "<" or ">" signs, or the scale can be also balanced with "<=" or ">=" signs. just the other side must never be heavier.

so, in our case here

2x - 5 = 3

yes, the solution (the ONLY solution, actually) is x = 4. no other value of x allows the scale to be balanced.

2x - 5 >= 3

well, since it is a ">=" sign, we can be lazy and treat it like the equation above, and x = 4 is therefore a valid solution for the inequality too.

but so is every other value of x that makes the left side "heavier". what about e.g. 5 ?

2×5 - 5 >= 3

10 - 5 >= 3

5 >= 3

true, great ! so, e.g. x = 5 is also a valid solution.

what else ?

let's simplify the inequality

2x - 5 >= 3

2x >= 8

x >= 4

so, really every value of x that is greater or equal to 4 is a valid solution for the inequality.

-2x - 5 = 3

yes, the solution (the ONLY solution, actually) is x = -4. no other value of x allows the scale to be balanced.

-2x - 5 >= 3

well, since it is a ">=" sign, we can be lazy and treat it like the equation above, and x = -4 is therefore a valid solution for the inequality too.

but so is every other value of x that makes the left side "heavier". what about e.g. -5 ?

-2×-5 - 5 >= 3

remember, -×- = +

10 - 5 >= 3

5 >= 3

true, great ! so, e.g. x = -5 is also a valid solution.

what else ?

let's simplify the inequality

-2x - 5 >= 3

-2x >= 8

x <= -4

a multiplication or division by a negative value flips the inequality sign, because such an operation makes a light weight heavy and a heavy weight light.

so, really every value of x that is less or equal to -4 is a valid solution for the inequality.

3 0

2 years ago

A vase in the shape of a cube measures 8 inches on each side. The vase is half full of water. How many cubic inches of water are

Ne4ueva [31]

Answer:

256

Step-by-step explanation:

First find the volume of the cube, which is 8^3, or 512. Half of that is how much water there is, which is 256 in^3.

7 0

3 years ago