1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Artyom0805 [142]
3 years ago
10

Suppose that out of the original 100 increase in government spending, 33 will be recycled back into purchases of domestically pr

oduced goods and services in the second round and 10.89 is spent in the third round. Following this multiplier effect, what value would be recycled in the fourth round of this cycle?
Business
1 answer:
serious [3.7K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Multiplier effect in the 4th round = 3.58

Explanation:

A change in aggregate demand can create a much greater impact in the equilibrium national income. This is known as the multiplier effect. This occurs when injections of new demand for goods and services into the circular flow of income creates further rounds of spending. For example, if the government spending was on building new affordable houses then the need for housing materials will create demand for wood, cement and other housing supplies. Thus, these businesses will see a rise in sales. Whilst they benefit through profits, their employees would benefit from wages and salaries. As their income rises, they will spend it in the economy, and so will the businesses from their profits. This additional rounds of spending is the multiplier effect.

If a 100 increase creates 33 for the second round, it is 33% (33/100 x 100) i.e. 100 x 33% = 33

This is proven since 33 x 33% = 10.89 in the third round.

Hence, the multiplier effect in the forth round = 10.89 x 33% = 3.58

You might be interested in
In a Team environment, a Coordinator is?
ValentinkaMS [17]
Yes the answer is ymb=x your welcome
8 0
3 years ago
What is the Urban Dictionary definition of Makenzie
dusya [7]

Makenzie's are so awesome, funny, athletic, sweet, kindhearted and you will always laugh whenever your around a Makenzie. Makenzies and the most coolest people in the whole world you have to know a Makenzie now.

6 0
3 years ago
The payment of accounts payable would
Tema [17]
Decrease assets, decrease liabilities. Accounts payable are what the business owes (liabilities). By paying off accounts payable, the liabilities are decreasing (they owe less) and the assets are also decreasing (because they use assets/cash to pay off the liabilities, so they have less now).

Hope that helps
3 0
3 years ago
XYZ DebenturesIssue Date: 8-1-XXPayment Dates: J 1 & J 1Maturity Date: 7-1-XXSome years after issuance, a customer buys 10 d
SashulF [63]

Answer:

B. 105 days of accrued interest

Explanation:

The purchase on Thursday, October 12th will settle on Monday, October 16th - 2 business days after trade date.  

Accrued interest on corporate bonds is based on a 30days per month/360 day year.

And interest starts accruing from the day of the last interest payment, up to, but not including, settlement.

See below for day calculation

July   30 days

August  30 days

September 30 days

October  15 days (up to but excluding settlement)

Total  105 days

4 0
3 years ago
On December 29, 2005, BJ Co. sold an equity security investment that had been purchased on January 4, 2004. BJ owned no other ma
sineoko [7]

Answer:

AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery

No No

The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.

The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.

The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.

For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • During the month of March, Karen Company's employees earned wages of $68,000. Withholdings related to these wages were $5,202 fo
    9·1 answer
  • Some entrepreneurs Invent Innovative
    7·1 answer
  • Which is the most likely scenario in which someone would take out a short-term loan with a bank?
    6·1 answer
  • Oriole Tire Co. just paid an annual dividend of $1.70 on its common shares. If Oriole is expected to increase its annual dividen
    12·1 answer
  • Part P40 is a part used in the production of air conditioners at Jackson Corporation. The following costs and data relate Number
    11·1 answer
  • Ron sells commercial-grade tools to building contractors. Whenever he visits his customers, he looks to see if they are using hi
    6·1 answer
  • Suppose that the inverse demand equation is p​ = 100 minus 2Q and the supply equation is p​ = 2Q. If the price is controlled at
    5·1 answer
  • The management of Nicto Company plans to have an inventory at the end of each month equal to 30% of the next month's sales. Budg
    8·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST HELP ASAP
    9·2 answers
  • According to the video, what tasks are commonly performed by Farmworkers instead of by machines? Select three
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!