Thanks to decisions by the Supreme Court, home ownership in the United States is more inclusive of other races apart from White Americans.
Both before and after the Fair Housing Act formally made it illegal to discriminate based on a person's race and gender, the Supreme Court made some decisions that tried to make home ownership more inclusive such as:
- Shelley v. Kraemer - here the Supreme Court ruled that it was not possible to enforce covenants in the deeds to property that were restrictive based on race.
- Jones v. Mayer Co. - the Supreme Court ruled that any form of racial discrimination in home ownership was illegal
These are just two cases where the Supreme Court's decision affected homeownership but there are more.
We can conclude however, that based on the Supreme Court's decisions, homeownership is more inclusive of other races.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/2630375.</em>
The nation that attended the Congress of Panama in 1826 in the options was A. Columbia.
<h3>What was the Congress of Panama?</h3>
In 1826, Simón Bolívar called for the Congress of Panama which was to help the newly independent Latin American republics to come up with a unified policy.
Columbia attended but Brazil did not. Chile and Argentina did not like how influential Simón Bolívar was and so did not attend either.
Find out more on the Simon Bolivar at brainly.com/question/1402690.
#SPJ12
unemployment rate is 3%
the labor force participation rate is 22%
Answer: How did market economy encourage the cultivation of cash crops in the middle colonies? Market economy encouraged the cultivation of cash crops in the Middle Colonies because they could be easily be grown, and could be sold for profit that did not have to go to the government.
Explanation:
What do you mean? Could you be more specific?