Answer:
Higgs's argument is stronger because Folsom's primary arguments involved quotes. Quotes can be unreliable, especially if chosen with bias from a selected group of people. Beyond that, quotes from people that lived in the moment are often short-sighted and don't understand long term effects. While Folsom does also source historians, he focuses a lot on Roosevelt's interest spending and believes that the money that went back to the American people actually prolonged suffering. Higgs, however, focuses on the short and long-term effects of the New Deal and uses a lot of data to prove his point. While he does have quotes, he doesn't rely on them to make or break his argument, unlike Folsom. Higgs is also able to understand some of the negatives of the New Deal, unlike Folsom who did not pay any attention to the other side of the issue.
Explanation:
This is for part two of the question.
<span>isolationism in world affairs </span>
Cambodia, the murders were commited by the Khmer Rouge.
The Church created political unity in Europe by spreading its influence to various spheres of life and uniting the people together as Christians. The people also believed the Church and considered it the final authority in a variety of areas
The Enlightenment was an incredibly a revolutionary movement because it ushered in a new era of knowledge in the sciences and arts--literally a "re-birth" of the classical ideals of what a civilization should be like--thus ending a period of stagnant "Dark Ages".
